Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is an undeniable fact that
punishment
for crimes is always one of the fiery issues in our society. There is a debate on whether criminals should receive a standard sentence regardless of the situation or if the circumstances surrounding the crime
should be considered before determining the punishment
. This
essay will explore both perspectives, however
, I personally lean towards the idea of taking into account the context of the crime
when sentencing an individual.
One perspective suggests that implementing fixed penalties for various crimes can effectively maintain social order and decrease crime
rates. This
is because individuals will face consequences for their irresponsible actions, which will make them reconsider breaking the law. For example
, Vietnam is one of the few countries with the toughest punishments for drug crime
. Anyone found guilty of possessing more than 600 grams of heroin, or more than 20 kilograms of opium, can face capital punishment
.
Considering all factors comprehensively, taking into account all factors in a comprehensive manner can lead to a more unbiased assessment of offenders. To elaborate further
, various situations and intricate aspects of human nature intertwine to generate different motivations for a particular crime
. For instance
, individuals may resort to self-defense
when faced with murderers or unintentionally cause manslaughter Change the spelling
self-defence
while
driving. Although
these two scenarios can be categorized as the same crime
, namely murder, both criminals do not display aggressive intentions towards their victims. If the court were to impose identical punishments for these cases as it does for general murder, it would fail to administer justice to innocent individuals and reveal a lack of objectivity in the legal system.
In conclusion, there are various perspectives on whether consistent punishment
should be applied to each category of crime
or if the underlying intent and circumstances leading to the crime
should also
be taken into consideration. I am, firmly, in favor
of the latter position, owing to the reasons delineated previously.Change the spelling
favour
Submitted by jakelong16091994 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence
Ensure a smooth transition between all main points introduced. Occasionally, the shifts can feel abrupt. Using transitional phrases like 'on the other hand' or 'additionally' can enhance the flow.
task achievements
Explore different forms of crimes beyond the given examples to add variety and show a deeper understanding. Avoid relying too heavily on singular cases as universal evidence.
introduction
Your introduction is clear and sets a solid foundation for the essay. It introduces the topic and your stance effectively.
support
Providing a real-life example (like the Vietnamese law) enhances the credibility and relevance of your points.
conclusion
The essay concludes with a precise recap of both viewpoints along with your personal opinion, reinforcing the essay's central argument well.