In some countries, criminal trials are shown on the television for the public. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In some nations, criminal
trials
have been broadcast to the public. I firmly believe that their advantages overshadow their disadvantages.
The foremost benefit is the transparency of judicial procedures. Public scrutiny can ensure that all parties involved in the trial, including judges, lawyers, and law enforcement, adhere to high standards of human rights and fairness. For example
, through criminal broadcasting, citizens could verify the authenticity of the defendant's rights in custody, such
as access to legal services and living in healthy conditions rather than suffering torture or coerced confessions. This
can foster trust in the general public toward the judicial system, ensuring all criminal trials
are conducted legally and minimizing errors in judgment. Consequently
, these shows ensure that victims can seek justice and offenders receive suitable sentences.
Furthermore
, these broadcasts influence public awareness and function as a deterrent. Televised trials
can serve as educational tools, helping citizens learn about legal procedures, rights, and the functioning of the justice system. Highlighting significant cases can raise awareness about important legal and social issues, potentially leading to societal change and reform that may stem from public proposals. Besides
, a higher understanding of laws leads to more consideration of benefits and punishment in making decisions both by chance or deliberately. Seeing the consequences of criminal behaviour publicly displayed may deter potential offenders from committing crimes, knowing they could face similar public exposure.
However
, the chief drawback is the influence of mass media. Social outlets might prioritize sensational aspects of a case to attract viewers, overshadowing the objective reporting of facts and leading to a "trial by the public.” The complex legal arguments and procedures might be misinterpreted by the general public, leading to misinformation and confusion. As a result
, media pressure and misunderstandings lead to controversial disputes among the population. Moreover
, the influence of media on victims, defendants, and their families can be profound. Watching trials
involving graphic evidence and emotional testimony can cause distress to viewers, particularly victims’ families and those with a personal connection to the case. Additionally
, televised trials
can invade the privacy of victims, subjecting them to public scrutiny and potential harassment. For instance
, the permanent public record of the trial can affect the lives of those involved long after the trial has concluded, making it difficult for them to reintegrate into society.
To conclude
, despite the significant benefits of televising criminal trials
, which include promoting transparency, accountability, and legal education, it presents notable drawbacks, including potential news sensationalism, misinformation, and invasion of privacy. Nevertheless
, the overall
advantages, particularly in fostering trust in the judicial system and deterring criminal behaviour, outweigh the disadvantages.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay does a good job of addressing the task, and your examples are relevant and specific. However, to push your score higher, consider adding more diverse examples to support your points and ensure each point is detailed thoroughly.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is well organized, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. To improve, ensure every paragraph flows logically from the previous one, perhaps using more transitional phrases for smoother coherence. Also, consider linking some ideas more explicitly to strengthen the connectivity of your argument.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction that states your position firmly and a conclusion that neatly wraps up your argument, which is excellent for coherence and task achievement.
task achievement
The examples you provide are relevant and help illustrate your points effectively, which strengthens your task achievement.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is generally well structured, with clear main points that are logically organized, contributing positively to coherence and cohesion.
Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.
Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.
When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.
Linking words for giving examples:
- for example
- for instance
- to illustrate this
- to give a clear example
- such as
- namely
- to illustrate
- take, for example