Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? In what other ways the assessment of a child can be done?
There is considerable dispute about whether continual assessment or other methods could possibly replace formal
examinations
to assess a student
's performance
. From my perspective, academic investigations are the best way
to evaluate a student
's performance
.
Despite some negligible drawbacks, formal examinations
are considered the most effective way
to evaluate educational performance
. Firstly
, the greatest benefit is the time
efficiency of completing an academic test. For example
, exams provide a standardized way
to measure knowledge
and understand the extent of many students
in a short period. Teachers can have the overall
performance
of their students
in an objective measurement in a short time
, allowing them to tailor curricula and plan revision lessons appropriately to balance the breadth of knowledge
transferred and the depth of understanding. Furthermore
, formal examinations
require a diverse range of knowledge
, so students
are trained in a pressured environment. This
enables learners to confront and handle pressure, and stress resilience is an essential skill for their future careers. However
, due to
the extensive range of knowledge
and the limited revision time
, students
often prioritize rote learning over deep comprehension, which does not fully represent their abilities.
On the other hand
, continual assessments
are a viable alternative to formal examinations
. Continual assessments
use various techniques to evaluate learners’ performances, thereby assessing a wider range of skills, including research, teamwork, and creativity. For instance
, utilizing diverse methods, such
as group work and individual projects, provides ongoing feedback, helping students
improve throughout the course. Nevertheless
, the time
efficiency and depth of understanding offered by formal examinations
are superior to other methods, like continual assessments
.
In conclusion, though formal examinations
have their drawbacks, they remain the most effective way
to assess a student
's performance
because of their time
efficiency and ability to provide standardized, objective measurements of knowledge
. Continual assessments
, with their focus on a broader scope of skills and ongoing feedback, offer valuable alternatives but cannot fully replace the comprehensive evaluation provided by formal exams. Therefore
, a hybrid method that combines both approaches would harness the strengths of each, providing a more complete picture of student
performance
and better preparing them for future challenges.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
For further improvement, ensure that all main points are equally supported with relevant examples and evidence. This will strengthen your argument and make your essay more convincing.
coherence cohesion
Work on varying your sentence structures and using a wider range of cohesive devices to enhance the flow of your essay. This will help in achieving a more sophisticated level of coherence and cohesion.
task achievement
The essay offers a comprehensive response to the prompt, discussing both formal examinations and continual assessment.
coherence cohesion
The introduction effectively sets up the debate, and the conclusion neatly ties together the main points while offering a balanced viewpoint.
coherence cohesion
The ideas are generally clear and well-organized, with a logical structure that makes the essay easy to follow.