Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? In what other ways the assessment of a child can be done?

There is considerable dispute about whether continual assessment or other methods could possibly replace formal

examinations

to assess a

student

's

performance

. From my perspective, academic investigations are the best

way

to evaluate a

student

's

performance

. Despite some negligible drawbacks, formal

examinations

are considered the most effective

way

to evaluate educational

performance

.

Firstly

, the greatest benefit is the

time

efficiency of completing an academic test.

For example

, exams provide a standardized

way

to measure

knowledge

and understand the extent of many

students

in a short period. Teachers can have the

overall

performance

of their

students

in an objective measurement in a short

time

, allowing them to tailor curricula and plan revision lessons appropriately to balance the breadth of

knowledge

transferred and the depth of understanding.

Furthermore

, formal

examinations

require a diverse range of

knowledge

, so

students

are trained in a pressured environment.

This

enables learners to confront and handle pressure, and stress resilience is an essential skill for their future careers.

However

,

due to

the extensive range of

knowledge

and the limited revision

time

,

students

often prioritize rote learning over deep comprehension, which does not fully represent their abilities.

On the other hand

, continual

assessments

are a viable alternative to formal

examinations

. Continual

assessments

use various techniques to evaluate learners’ performances, thereby assessing a wider range of skills, including research, teamwork, and creativity.

For instance

, utilizing diverse methods,

such

as group work and individual projects, provides ongoing feedback, helping

students

improve throughout the course.

Nevertheless

, the

time

efficiency and depth of understanding offered by formal

examinations

are superior to other methods, like continual

assessments

. In conclusion, though formal

examinations

have their drawbacks, they remain the most effective

way

to assess a

student

's

performance

because of their

time

efficiency and ability to provide standardized, objective measurements of

knowledge

. Continual

assessments

, with their focus on a broader scope of skills and ongoing feedback, offer valuable alternatives but cannot fully replace the comprehensive evaluation provided by formal exams.

Therefore

, a hybrid method that combines both approaches would harness the strengths of each, providing a more complete picture of

student

performance

and better preparing them for future challenges.