One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years’ time, but they cause the same amount of pollution. So same people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are ongoing debates regarding the pollution caused by fuel consumption in flights and cars. Some argue that unnecessary

air

travel,

such

as tourist visits, should not be encouraged, others believe that restricting private automobile usage is more crucial. In

this

essay, I will examine both viewpoints and present my perspective. On the one hand, there are compelling reasons to support non-essential flights, primarily

due to

their significant contribution to the national economy. By expanding

air

routes, more opportunities for local tourism arise, which, in turn, boosts economic growth. Taking Danang as an example, since the increase to 111 local and international landings daily, its revenue from the tourism industry has doubled compared to the same six-month period

last

year.

Additionally

,

air

travel plays a vital role in the exchange and trade of products in certain countries. Given the geographical constraints of some nations,

such

as the inability to develop other transportation methods like waterways or railways, airlines emerge as a practical solution. Nepal,

for example

—a landlocked country with rugged terrain—where the construction of highways and railways would be prohibitively expensive and challenging.

On the other hand

, the booming use of private vehicles needs thorough reevaluation.

Whereas

a Boeing or an Airbus can transport over 300 passengers per journey, a car typically carries only about 4-7 people, resulting in significant fossil fuel emissions from on the road daily.

This

emission level can often surpass that of a single flight.

Moreover

, traffic jams exacerbate the problem, as idling vehicles produce a considerable amount of pollution.

Furthermore

, the risks associated with cars present another strong argument for discouraging their use. The proliferation of car ownership has led to a notable increase in injuries and fatalities from car accidents. In conclusion, considering the benefits of

air

travel, whether they are essential or non-essential in boosting local economies and giving access to certain regions

as well as

the drawbacks of private means of transportation, I incline more toward the former in the long term.