In
this
essay, I will discuss arguments from both sides before stating why I strongly advocate that practical subjects are way more beneficial for students than academic subjects. A more nuanced picture is necessary.
Linking Words
To begin
with, proponents of academic modules Linking Words
such
as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, as they allow schoolchildren to think logically and make sense of the world that we are living in. Linking Words
For instance
, academic modules increase critical thinking and the urge to ask questions about how things work around us. Chemistry helps us understand through what method chemical reactions take place. Linking Words
Additionally
, physics helps us to understand the science behind every moving object, yet at the same time, history helps us to understand what events took place in the past.
Linking Words
On the contrary
, proponents of practical courses Linking Words
such
as motor mechanics and cooking are crucial for schoolchildren and should be compulsory for every scholar. Real-world courses encourage them to practice practical thinking, which should be prioritized because they prepare them for the real world. Linking Words
For instance
, many individuals are not aware of how to cook, knowledge related to motor mechanics, how to pay their bills, or handle their taxes, and their finances. Schools should focus on these things, as it will benefit them in the growing stage.
Linking Words
To conclude
, from the arguments and examples given, I firmly believe that scholarly concepts should be taught, but to a certain extent, and Linking Words
then
students should be allowed to choose whether they want to continue those concepts or not. But these real-world concepts should be compulsory for every scholar as they prepare them for the real functional world and make them independent.Linking Words
somynarain12