The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

There is an ongoing debate about the true role nuclear
weapons
play in keeping the
peace
. Some people argue that nuclear power is eco-friendly and safe for the environment. I completely disagree with
this
statement and believe that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of nuclear technology. There are several reasons why nuclear
weapons
are not effective in maintaining world
peace
.
Firstly
, some dictators use the threat of nuclear
weapons
to antagonise and threaten smaller countries to do their bidding.
For instance
, in North Korea, the leader has warned South Korea not to meddle with their national affairs
otherwise
they would launch nuclear rockets.
This
is a prime example of a country using bullying tactics to harm those with lesser military capabilities.
Secondly
, only a few countries have access to
such
dangerous
weapons
.
This
would mean that only select countries are the ones playing with people’s lives. So
instead
of keeping the
peace
, the opposite can happen. It is argued by some that nuclear power does not provide cheap or clean air. They argue that it only leads to environmental disasters and health problems.
This
is because of the several nuclear incidents that have happened over the past 100 years.
For instance
, in Ukraine and Japan, there have been two well-known accidents involving nuclear technology. The disaster resulted in various health complications
such
as blood cancer, asthma and autoimmune diseases
as well as
pollution and dirty air.
Hence
, the role of nuclear power in being eco-friendly is debatable.
To conclude
, I believe that the drawbacks of nuclear technology are far greater than any advantages
due to
the multiple health issues and environmental problems associated with its existence.
Furthermore
, the idea that nuclear
weapons
maintain world
peace
is laughable.
Submitted by mraha409 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay presents a clear position against the benefits of nuclear technology, which aligns well with the task requirements. However, including a more balanced discussion of opposing views could enhance the depth of the argument. For instance, acknowledging some benefits before refuting them can make your position more convincing.
coherence cohesion
Some connections between points could be more explicit to improve the overall coherence. For instance, you might use more linking phrases such as 'Moreover,' 'Furthermore,' or 'For example,' to guide the reader through your arguments more smoothly.
task achievement
You provide relevant and specific examples, such as the situations in North Korea, Ukraine, and Japan, which robustly support your arguments. This strengthens your task response significantly.
coherence cohesion
You have structured your essay with clear paragraphs, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. This solid organizational structure helps in maintaining logical flow and coherence.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Deterrence
  • Mutually assured destruction
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Cost-effective
  • Radiation therapy
  • Proliferation
  • Rogue states
  • Radioactive waste disposal
  • Catastrophic accidents
  • Climate change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: