Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Certain individuals claim that only the government should control scientific investigations.
This
essay agrees with this
statement because it gives access to previous data and provides financial support.
Firstly
, carrying out research by the government offers an additional opportunity to look at past investigated evidence. This
type of company conducts different types of experiments annually, such
as surveys or interviews. This
pieces
of information is stored in one place, which can be accessible for members of the research in order to prove their hypothesis with examples or to compare conducted results with past conditions. Fix the agreement mistake
piece
For example
, according to
the official website of establishment scientists in the USA, the state allows 78% of stuff to be taken from previous private research.
Secondly
, this
control can provide monetary help. That is
due to
the fact that each experiment requires particular equipment and substances, which cost a lot of money. Subsequently
, to carry out these tests, one part of the country's budget should be allocated every year or month. In contrast
, the same situation can cause problems for private companies, as they need to spend cash on their own profits. Take, for instance
, biologists who want to find solutions to the issue of soil erosion. To achieve this
, they need to buy a small part of the earth in a particular village, which can be funded by the state.
In conclusion, the authority of the government in science-related explorations is better because I believe that it gives golden opportunities, such
as extra information and budgetary help.Submitted by Aqxniet on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay does a good job of responding to the task, but it can be improved by fully addressing counterarguments or alternative perspectives. This would make your argument more robust.
task achievement
While your ideas are clear and comprehensive, making them more compelling and richer in detail would help. Try to elaborate further on how government control specifically aids scientific research compared to private companies.
coherence cohesion
Your essay's logical structure is generally sound, but some transitions between points could be smoother. For example, linking phrases that clearly show how one idea leads to another can help improve the flow.
coherence cohesion
Including a few more examples and expanding on them in detail would strengthen your arguments. This shows a deeper understanding of the topic and supports your main points effectively.
introduction conclusion present
Your introduction is clear and directly states your position, which sets a strong foundation for your essay.
introduction conclusion present
You conclude effectively, summarizing the main points and reiterating your stance. This provides closure and reinforces your argument.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?