Many believe that being good at a sport is a result of talent while others think that it comes from hard work. Discuss both use and give your reason.

Some people agree that having

talent

is essential if you want to master a

sport

.

On the other hand

, many argue that working consistently and hardly in a

sport

will make you great at it. I think that

although

talent

is important, still, humans can still be good at any

sport

if they are willing to do their best and believe in themselves. On the one hand, many proponents emphasize that anyone can play any kind of

sport

that they want, but only talented

ones'

Correct your spelling

ones

show examples

who are able to achieve high results. They think that it's something in their gene, and if the player is talented naturally, it will be easier for him or her to generate better ideas faster than anyone else

while

playing.

Furthermore

, they will pass their tasks more properly than the others.

For instance

, a soccer player called Messi was able to gain many awards because it's something in his nature, playing soccer was easy for him even if he did not train as much as the others.

Conversely

, many people believe that once you have a goal to achieve in a

sport

and you are disciplined toward it, reaching

this

goal will just be a matter of time. Despite that

talent

plays a big role in being good at a

sport

, humans have no limitations if they are hungry to get something and working hard will help them in that.

In addition

,even if someone has a

talent

the real key to be unique is practice because without it you can not improve.

For example

, Cristiano Ronaldo is able to win against many talented players just because he works day and night

besides

that he has a goal to be the best in soccer. In conclusion,

while

many think that

talent

is crucial in sports, others choose hard work as the important part of being good at a

sport

. I agree with the second opinion, as commitment and hard work will make anything possible for us.