Some governments say how many children a family can hare in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes a necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
Measures
such
as taxation which prevents couples from having more than one or two children are also
controversial. While
some have claimed that such
policies are required to ensure sustainable development, others have seen it as a violation of individual rights.
Those who advocate for population
control
claim that birth control
is necessary to regulate consumption and improve standards of living. Population
density can negatively affect food, water, and health standards within a country. For example
, in 1979 China introduced the one-child policy designed to regulate the population
growth which was thought to negatively affect economic growth and development. Governments can easily arrest population
growth and hence
, have better standards of living and reduction of poverty.
In addition
, the environmental aspect remains an important factor, especially in the current world. Fewer people mean lower greenhouse gas emissions, lower rates of deforestation, and a decreased amount of pollutants in the environment. Population
control
can thus
be viewed as a way of addressing environmental degradation especially
in an era of climate change.
Add the comma(s)
, especially
On the other hand
, critics argue that population
control
measures infringe on human rights. The right to control
the number and spacing of children is a norm of international human rights law. Restrictions on this
right have implications that include skewed
sex ratio and a growing elderly Correct article usage
a skewed
population
especially as observed in the case of China after one
Correct determiner usage
the
child
policy was implemented. Correct your spelling
one-child
Furthermore
, it is noted that such
policies cumulatively target vulnerable populations. Increased taxation of large families can cause pressure on lower-income clientèle, thus
aggravating social injustice.
In conclusion, government intervention in population
control
may have some merits in terms of resource allocation and environmental conservation but also
poses serious ethical and humanitarian issues. There must be a balance of protecting freedom of choice while
at the same time enhancing for
sustainable development.Change preposition
apply
Submitted by minhlieu.hnd on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
introduction conclusion present
Improve the introduction to clearly state your position and outline the main points that will be discussed. A well-structured introduction helps the reader understand the direction of your essay.
logical structure
Ensure all ideas are clearly linked with appropriate transition words or phrases. This will enhance the logical flow of the essay.
clear comprehensive ideas
Expand on and develop certain points for clearer comprehension. For example, you can give some specific statistics or cases related to the environmental benefits mentioned.
complete response
The essay provides a balanced view on the topic, discussing both pros and cons of government intervention in population control.
relevant specific examples
The main points are well-supported with examples, such as the mention of China's one-child policy and its implications.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?