Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The
efforts
of governments and big firms to preserve the environment
can be more profitable compared to the individuals’ efforts
which often have minimal impact. I vehemently espouse this
statement because big companies and local authorities have numerous methods with substantial funds to execute initiatives and policies and these can enormously assist to get quick positive outcomes.
To begin
with, there are numerous reasons why individual efforts
are few in comparison with the big companies and governments. Foremost, governments have a well-planned structure with obligations to preserve the environment
which they require to follow. For example
, in the event of World Summit 1992, not only did nations sign a cut-off of 5-10% per cent carbon emissions but also
the World Bank issued funds to achieve these targets and surprisingly about 55 nations reached the level of 7 per cent. Because of appropriate policies and their implementations with high taxes and fines, such
countries made their citizens follow all the instructions. Such
positive outcomes were never possible at individual levels because it requires it to be done at a higher level which is possible only through authority.
Additionally
, by considering the role of big corporations, they can make policies for environment
protection which are essential to be followed by all the branches and employees. For instance
, Amazon, an American company, issued instructions for all its worldwide branches to stop using plastic packing in March 2017 and as per the annual report for the next year, plastic packing was completely thrown off by the company. Moreover
, these companies can provide incentives for planting trees which can be a breakthrough for the preservation of the atmosphere. Therefore
, these steps can never automatically be adopted by individuals due to
a shortage of funds.
To conclude
, I completely agree that people’s efforts
are not considerable in front of the efforts
of big organisations and authorities since both these institutions have enormous techniques with financial resources to create a major change in the protection of the environment
.Submitted by Mrjit147 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
You have effectively addressed the task, presenting a clear argument and supporting your points with relevant examples. However, incorporating more perspectives could further enrich the essay. For example, consider briefly discussing how individual efforts can complement those of governments and companies.
coherence cohesion
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and cohesion. Transition words and phrases are used effectively to guide the reader through your points. However, ensure that your structural flow is immaculate by revisiting some connecting phrases to further smooth out paragraph transitions.
task achievement
You provided a clear and well-reasoned argument, outlining the greater impact of governmental and corporate efforts on environmental preservation.
task achievement
Specific examples, such as the World Summit 1992 and Amazon's policy change in 2017, greatly enhance the credibility and persuasiveness of your argument.
coherence cohesion
The structure of the essay, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, is well-organized and helps in maintaining a logical flow of ideas.
coherence cohesion
Effective use of transition words and phrases contributes to the essay's readability and ensures a coherent progression of ideas.