Serious violent crime among people who under - 18 are becoming more common. Some people think that children who commit serious crimes should be treated like adults, while others would say that they should be rehabilitaited. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in serious violent

crimes

committed by individuals under the age of 18.

This

trend has sparked a debate regarding the appropriate response to

such

offenses

Change the spelling

offences

show examples

. Some argue that juveniles who commit serious

crimes

should be treated and punished as

adults

,

while

others believe they should be rehabilitated.

This

essay will discuss both perspectives and present my own opinion on the matter. Proponents of treating juvenile

offenders

as

adults

argue that the severity of the crime should dictate the punishment, irrespective of the offender’s age. They believe that serious

crimes

such

as murder, rape, or armed robbery have devastating impacts on victims and society, necessitating stringent consequences.

This

approach

is grounded in the principle of justice, asserting that all individuals, regardless of age, should be held accountable for their actions.

Additionally

, advocates argue that treating young

offenders

as

adults

could serve as a deterrent, potentially preventing other minors from engaging in similar criminal

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

.

Conversely

, those who support the rehabilitation of juvenile

offenders

emphasize recognizing the developmental and psychological differences between children and

adults

. They argue that many young

offenders

come from backgrounds marked by trauma, abuse, or neglect, which significantly influence their

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

. By addressing these issues through therapeutic and educational programs, society can offer these individuals a chance to reform and reintegrate as productive members. Supporters of rehabilitation

also

highlight that the adolescent brain is not fully developed, particularly in areas related to impulse control and decision-making, making young people more susceptible to poor judgment and peer pressure.

Therefore

, a rehabilitative

approach

is seen as more appropriate and effective in facilitating long-term positive change. In conclusion, the debate on whether juvenile

offenders

should be treated as

adults

or rehabilitated involves complex considerations of justice and human development.

While

serious

crimes

require accountability, it is equally important to recognize the potential for change in young

offenders

. In my opinion, a balanced

approach

that incorporates both accountability and rehabilitation is the most effective solution.

This

approach

ensures that young

offenders

understand the consequences of their actions

while

receiving the support needed to transform their lives positively. By blending punitive measures with rehabilitative services, society can foster both justice and the opportunity for reform.