Some cities have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. People think that they should be free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Much has been debated over the loose regulation of the architectural styles of new houses and office
buildings
, with some arguing that it is better to allow people to have the freedom to choose the design
they want. While
acknowledging the reasons for this
thinking, I would contend that potential benefits overshadow its perceived drawbacks.
Granted, supporters are justified when stating that cities have little control over the design
of buildings
due to
many disadvantages. First,
without strict building standards, there may be an increased risk of constructing unsafe buildings
that do not withstand natural disasters or even make challenges for escape in emergency cases. For instance
, scarcity of land avoids the fire way which mainly caused the tragic death of 56 people in an apartment in Ha Noi City, Vietnam in 2023. In addition
, a lack of uniformity can result in chaos, ruining the outlay of the area and leading to cultural insensitiveness. To give an example, in today's metropolises, it is not uncommon to see skyscrapers dominating the sight of ancient buildings
that represent the cultural and historical features of the land.
Despite such
downfalls, I side with those who believe in allowing freedom in design
. If all houses look alike, it might cause some boredom. Therefore
, the diversity in house design
, such
as the combination of classical and state-of-the-art as well as
unique constructions encourages designers to think outside the box and develop creative thinking, which can enrich social life and enhance the visual appeal of a city. Furthermore
, fewer regulations could bring economic benefits by using cheap materials or reducing the cost and time associated with obtaining permits and approvals. To illustrate, amodular
building, affordable housing, and movable housing are the current concepts of construction by which the capital required can be minimised drastically.
In conclusion, despite the demerits of the loose control over the architecture of houses namely safety concerns and cultural insensitivity, I am in favour of allowing the public to freely plan their own Correct your spelling
a modular
modular
design
by virtue of its creative freedom and economic benefits.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
While your essay has a clear structure, some of the transitions between paragraphs and ideas could be smoother. Try to use more linking words and phrases to guide the reader through your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph starts with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea. This will help in making your argument more coherent.
task achievement
Though your examples are relevant, some of them need a bit more explanation. Make sure to fully explain how your examples support your points.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction is well-written and sets up the discussion quite effectively.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates your opinion clearly.
task achievement
You have provided relevant and specific examples that add weight to your arguments.