The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some
people
consider that humans should be the main topic of scientific research. While
there are some right sides, I do not entirely agree on
Change preposition
with
this
opinion. This
essay will discuss why I disagree by giving examples and explaining.
To begin
with, scientific developments are vital not only for humans but also
for the environment. The environment and people
are completely related to each other. Take climate change as an example, when people
overuse technological devices or individual vehicles, it can damage the Earth and climate. Having opportunities for these technologies is significant but if people
exploit science only for people
`s comfort it can cause terrible results. To sum up
, people
have to have a balance between people
`s benefit and realism.
Another reason why I disagree, people
share the earth with other kinds of lives, such
as animals, and plants. To protect ethical issues, researchers should give the same importance to other forms. For instance
, the medicine sector must improve some drugs and treatments for animals as well as
for people
. A world in which only people
do not provide healthy areas to them. As like first argument, the most important issue is balance.
On the other hand
, others strongly believe that humans should be the main character in scientific topics. While
there are some understandable sides, like for development we need to improve people
`s lives, it looks more selfish than logical.
In conclusion, although
it is a common belief that the importance of people
in scientific research from my view to provide a balance between the environment, other forms of lives can be more profitable not only for people
but also
for all earth.Submitted by serab.5091 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Ensure that you present a clear thesis statement in the introduction. Your current thesis statement is somewhat vague. Specify clearly to what extent you agree or disagree with the statement.
task achievement
Provide more specific examples or evidence to support your points. For instance, mentioning specific environmental or medical advancements could strengthen your argument.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the logical flow between paragraphs. Use linking phrases and words to create smoother transitions and ensure each paragraph clearly follows the previous one.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
task achievement
The writer addresses both sides of the argument, which shows a balanced perspective.
task achievement
There is a good attempt to discuss multiple aspects of the topic, such as the environment, animals, and plants.