Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some
people
argue that states should invest in order to find a new globe to be inhabited , others claim that with the same money, we should solve our earth’s problems, personally, I support the latter opinion. This
essay will discuss both ideas and explain my view clearly.
On the one hand , people
who assert that governments should search for another planet
in our solar system think that , as global problems keep increasing every day such
as global warming and its consequences,we should find another habitable planet
such
as Mars .That is
to say ,according to
some scientists, the greenhouse gases already depleted the atmosphere layers which resulted in irreparable damage to the planet
, as we currently facing the
consequences Correct article usage
apply
such
as natural disasters , including, hurricanes,earthquakes and tornadoes , since this
damage is irreversible,they suggest that to find another planet
to live on, encouraging the researches that discussing how to improve Mars to become an ideal planet
for human beings live , and solve its atmospheric problems such
as its thin atmospheric layer , lack of oxygen and its red toxic dust.
On the other hand
, some people
think that the budget allocated for localization of the new place and artificial adjustment to match humankind's needs will be more than enough to restore the earth and save humanity. For example
, the same amount of money and maybe much less could save the planet
by preserving and protecting the environment , in addition
to ,substituting fossil fuels with clean energy and using renewable resources . Moreover
, animals should be protected from extinction by providing a suitable,clean environment .Furthermore
, some of the finance can be allocated for subsidies to help people
who live on the margin of society as well as
providing shelters for the homeless , hence
alleviation of scarcity and poverty. I strongly believe that investing money in repairing our globe would result in more prosperity ,stable life and abundant nutritional resources for people
, However
,transferring to another planet
like Mars could result in human extinction.
To sum up
, although
moving to another planet
seems to be an acceptable idea , I believe that repairing and protecting our place would be easier and cheaper.Submitted by rehabat79 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
general
Consider refining the introductory paragraph. While your stance is clear, breaking the first sentence into two sentences might improve clarity.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph discusses one main idea. For example, separating the discussion on Earth's environmental protection and social problems into two paragraphs could enhance readability.
coherence cohesion
Provide clearer transitions between ideas. Words like 'Firstly,' 'Secondly,' and 'On the contrary' can help guide the reader more effectively.
task achievement
Use more specific examples to support your main points. For instance, mention specific initiatives or technologies that contribute to reducing global warming or protecting wildlife.
general
The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion which enhances overall readability.
coherence cohesion
The writer presents both sides of the argument effectively before stating their own opinion, reflecting a balanced discussion.