Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There exists a division of opinion regarding the contributors to the resolution of
climate
change
issues; some assert that individuals can take decisive actions, while
others contend that the onus rests solely upon governmental bodies, given that individual efforts appear minimal. In my view, it is imperative that both the government and citizens collaboratively share the responsibility in
addressing Change preposition
for
this
pressing issue. The ensuing discussion will examine both perspectives and elucidate the rationale supporting my position.
As global citizens, we bear a collective responsibility to safeguard our planet. Consequently
, it is essential for people to undertake significant actions to combat the challenges posed by climate
change
. This
necessitates that we actively engage in various environmentally beneficial practices, like afforestation, waste recycling, and the reduction of plastic consumption, which often results in harmful incineration. Such
proactive measures are paramount for preserving the natural environment by alleviating pollution and its associated causes. Thus
, it is pivotal for each human to contribute to this
endeavour.
Conversely
, proponents of the opposing viewpoint argue that individual efforts and contributions are inadequate, positing that governmental intervention is necessary for effective change
. This
perspective suggests a lack of clarity regarding the methodologies required to address the contributing factors of climate
change
, highlighting the need for authoritative guidance. As a result
, legislative bodies must formulate actionable policies, like prohibiting plastic bags, preventing deforestation, and endorsing initiatives that promote tree planting. However
, the successful implementation of these strategies is contingent upon the active cooperation of the populace.
In conclusion, although
divergent opinions persist regarding the roles of people versus governmental entities in the fight against climate
change
, I advocate for a synergistic approach in which both the administrative authorities and citizens work collaboratively to confront this
pervasive environmental challenge.Submitted by omondavlat91 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While the essay addresses both views of the argument effectively, adding more specific examples or case studies to substantiate your points would strengthen your argument further.
coherence cohesion
Although the essay has a clear structure, ensure smoother transitions between ideas and paragraphs to enhance the logical flow.
coherence cohesion
The essay includes a well-defined introduction and conclusion which encapsulate the main points effectively.
task achievement
The writer provides a complete response to the prompt by addressing both perspectives before presenting their own opinion.
Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
You should use complex sentences in your writing, but it does not mean that you should try to make all of our sentences complex.
‘Complex’ sentences are not actually very complex; they are just two or more simple sentences put together. Putting them together makes the essay more coherent and cohesive.
Examples:
I really want to study but I’m too tired.
I wore a warm coat because the weather was cold.
If action is not taken soon on climate change, global warming will get worse.