Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution.

Within some nations, personal transports are now forbidden from specific town

centers

Change the spelling

centres

show examples

. Having banned

cars

in

city

centers

Change the spelling

centres

show examples

may have some advantages, but there will be some drawbacks. The first benefit of banning private

cars

is that there will be fewer car accidents or none at all. Because it will be much safer to walk around the middle part of the

city

.

For example

, in my town, the government made personal

cars

illegal to forbid people to use

cars

around the central part of the

city

. For a long time, we didn't have any car accidents ever since the rule was established. Another profit is that parking lots are completely free, so they can be used for building structures

instead

of futile parking places.

Moreover

, with no

cars

, there will be less carbon dioxide.

Thus

, making people’s lives a little bit better. Another strength is that there will be more public zones

such

as restaurants, parks, and so on.

However

, I believe

that is

advantageous for specific cities, but still, there are slight disadvantages. Limiting the usage of private transport may alleviate certain obstacles, and

also

facilitate those population living. Despite

this

, there are small weaknesses as commuting from one place to another is more likely to be harder in comparison to using their bought

cars

.

Similarly

, people who live outside the

city

can encounter

this

problem either.

To sum up

, limiting the usage of private transport is more likely to be advantageous for definite cities with little problems with commuting. In my point of view, the government should improve the public transportation system,

hence

making people’s lives much better.