Should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?
The question of whether long-term
job
seekers
receiving government benefits should be required to perform voluntary work
in exchange for support
is a complex and nuanced issue. On one hand, such
a policy could foster a sense of contribution and community
engagement among those who are unemployed. On the other hand
, it raises concerns about the effectiveness and fairness of such
measures.
One significant advantage of requiring voluntary work
is that it can provide job
seekers
with valuable skills
and experience that may enhance their employability. By participating in community
service or non-profit work
, individuals can develop new skills
, build their resumes, and create networking opportunities
that could lead to employment. For example
, someone working on a community
project might gain skills
in project management or teamwork, which are transferable to various job
sectors. This
approach
also
fosters a sense of purpose and productivity, which can be beneficial for mental health and motivation.
Additionally
, voluntary work
can help address community
needs and contribute to social cohesion. Many non-profit organizations rely heavily on volunteers to operate effectively. By channeling
Change the spelling
channelling
job
seekers
into these roles, communities can benefit from increased support
and resources, enhancing overall
well-being and solidarity.
However
, there are notable concerns with this
approach
. Forcing individuals to work
without pay, even in a voluntary capacity, could be seen as exploitative, particularly if the tasks do not align with their skills
or career goals. It is crucial to ensure that any such
program provides meaningful and relevant work
opportunities
, rather than merely creating a façade of productivity. Moreover
, job
seekers
may face barriers such
as lack of transportation or childcare that could hinder their ability to participate in voluntary work
.
Another important consideration is the potential for such
policies to stigmatize unemployed individuals. If not handled carefully, mandatory volunteer work
could reinforce negative stereotypes about job
seekers
, portraying them as unwilling or lazy rather than facing systemic challenges that contribute to long-term unemployment.
In practice, some countries have experimented with similar programs. For example
, the UK’s "Work
Programme" included elements of mandatory work
placements for job
seekers
. While
it aimed to improve employability, evaluations of the program have shown mixed results, highlighting the need for a balanced approach
that offers support
and opportunities
rather than imposing rigid requirements.
In conclusion, while
requiring long-term job
seekers
receiving government benefits to engage in voluntary work
has potential benefits, it must be implemented thoughtfully and with sensitivity to individual circumstances. A more effective approach
might involve offering optional volunteer opportunities
alongside comprehensive support
services, ensuring that participation is genuinely beneficial and empowering for job
seekers
while
meeting community
needs.Submitted by acaitaz on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
While the essay maintains a clear and logical structure, ensuring each paragraph has a distinct point, it would benefit from additional linking phrases to further enhance cohesion between paragraphs.
task achievement
Expand on the relevant examples provided in each argument to offer even more detailed support for your points. This helps to strengthen the task achievement element.
task achievement
The essay takes a balanced view of the topic, considering both the advantages and potential drawbacks of requiring long-term job seekers to do voluntary work.
coherence cohesion
A strong introduction sets up the discussion effectively, and the conclusion ties the arguments together well, reinforcing the key points made throughout the essay.
task achievement
Supporting points are well articulated with logical reasoning, creating a comprehensive and thorough analysis.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.