The issue of
transportation
has sparked considerable debate in recent times. Some
people
contend that the public transit
systems
should receive increased funding from the political leadership. In my point of view, I partly agree with the given perspective.
This
essay will discuss some reasons in support of my view.
On the one hand, there are some arguments in favour of the idea that government should invest more in public
transportation
systems
.
To begin
with, more efficient public transit
systems
can reduce the number of vehicles on the road and make
travelingChange the spelling
show examples
easier. When public
transportation
is more reliable and accessible, it will become more attractive to the citizens who need to travel.
As a result
, a larger number of
people
choose public
transportation
instead
of driving private cars, reducing the number of vehicles in peak hours.
Furthermore
, public
transportation
can stimulate economic growth by making it easier for
people
to reach jobs, businesses, and cultural attractions.
For example
, public
transportation
makes it easier for
people
to reach job
centersChange the spelling
show examples
, especially in urban areas.
This
increased accessibility allows individuals to find employment opportunities that might
otherwise
be out of reach
due to
limited
transportation
options.
On the other hand
, there are several reasons against the statement that the government should allocate more money to public
transportation
.
Initially
, one main argument would be that building and maintaining modern public
transportation
systems
can be expensive, requiring significant government funding. Building underground rail networks requires extensive excavation,
tunnelingChange the spelling
show examples
, and the installation of complex infrastructure,
such
as tracks, stations, and ventilation
systems
. These projects can involve billions of dollars in costs.
For instance
, the construction of the Crossrail project in London, England, is estimated to have cost over £17 billion. Another argument would be that in rural areas or low-density urban areas, public
transportation
may not be feasible or cost-effective, limiting its reach.
For instance
, a public
transportation
system might struggle to attract riders
due to
the long wait times between services and the convenience of driving.
For
this
reason, it is difficult to maintain and bear the expense of operating frequent public transport routes.
All in all, the facts mentioned above created a dilemma when
people
evaluate the effects of
this
issue, and it has still sparked controversy in recent years. I personally believe that it could have both sides,
people
should have
further
consideration on
this
issue.