Some people believe that the effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause these types of pollution. others think that there are other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a common belief that imposing new
taxes
on manufacturing firms would reduce air pollution
; meanwhile, there are others who believe in using clever strategies for reduction
. I will discuss both views,
and personally, I am against the idea of taxation to prevent Remove the comma
apply
pollution
.
In many parts of the world, governments often introduce various taxes
to curb rising pollution
. Although
this
is a good opportunity to earn more revenue and improve the environment, however
,it is far-fetched from reality. In fact, the industrial zones are an integral part of a country's economy, and imposing taxes
could force many industrialists to close and withdraw their investments. This
could lead to massive unemployment and a reduction
in exports. For example
, the Bangladeshi government imposed heavy taxes
and restrictions on garment production in order to maximize revenue, but, in the long term its garment sector fell and the exports fell by 50%.
On the other hand
, there are three significant ways in which pollution
can be reduced. Firstly
, the research centres should focus on innovating the procedures that are currently in use, for instance
, the industries could use solar energy instead
of burning coal, this
would reduce the carbon emissions to a great extent and improve the quality of air. Correct pronoun usage
which
Secondly
, entrepreneurs should be encouraged to produce recycled products instead
of manufacturing them from scratch. This
can be achieved if the government provide some kind of tax reduction
or subsidy. Finally
, the authorities should create and impose restrictions on using certain chemicals that are potent for human health. For instance
, the Indian government banned the use of lead compounds in petroleum products. This
resulted in a reduction
of skin and lung diseases nationwide, and they decreased by 80%.
To conclude
, I don't encourage the idea of increased taxes
on the industries, Besides
, I recommend using smart and innovative solutions to control and reduce pollution
.Submitted by shahroz99dev on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
general
Ensure the consistency of language and ensure the essay is free from small inaccuracies for higher clarity. For example, the sentence 'For example, the Bangladeshi government imposed heavy taxes and restrictions on garment production in order to maximize revenue...' can be rephrased for better clarity.
task achievement
Provide a more balanced argument to strengthen the discussion on both views. The sentence 'I will discuss both views, and personally, I am against the idea of taxation to prevent pollution.' can be expanded to cover more pros and cons.
coherence cohesion
Ensure smoother transitions between points to improve coherence and cohesion. Phrases like 'Furthermore,' or 'In addition,' can help.
structure
The essay has a clear and well-defined introduction and conclusion, which is crucial.
content
The essay presents specific examples to support points, showing deep engagement with the topic.
clarity
The argument is generally clear and comprehensible, with logical reasoning presented.