In a public-funded healthcare system, people who are willing to pay for the best and fast treatment should be able to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In a public-funded healthcare system, people want to cut in line for faster
treatment
because they are willing to pay
money
, I completely disagree with
this
statement.
Firstly
, public-funded hospitals are funded by the government and
hence
, are equal for anyone.
While
I agree that public-funded hospitals have low budgets and could use some
money
, I do not think that people should be allowed to pay
money
and get fast
treatment
as it would be discriminating against the poor who
also
deserve fair and equal rights to live.
Furthermore
, one who is willing to pay
money
for faster
treatment
should reflect on the moral implications of prioritizing wealthier patients over others in dire need.
Lastly
, Public-funded hospitals provide better and cheaper treatments and are both accessible and affordable
by
Change preposition
to
show examples
the needy, buying
you
Change the pronoun
your
show examples
way to cut in line would encourage more people to do the same and
hence
,
lesser
Correct word choice
less
show examples
attention will go to the needy, who actually need it. Living in a democratic country means that everyone has the same rights, paying your way to cut in line would be a violation of these rights and can cost a life.
Moreover
, paying to get better and faster
treatment
would
also
widen the quality gap between those who have
money
and those who do not.
To conclude
, I
Submitted by satyarthverma88 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

introduction conclusion present
Ensure your essay has a clear introduction and a comprehensive conclusion to improve structure and closure.
relevant specific examples
Strengthen your arguments with specific examples and evidence to make them more convincing.
clear comprehensive ideas
Your stance on the issue is clear and consistently maintained throughout the essay.
complete response
The essay addresses the key components of the prompt, expressing a clear viewpoint on whether people should pay to get faster treatment in a public-funded healthcare system.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Healthcare system
  • Public-funded
  • Private healthcare
  • Two-tier system
  • Equity
  • Efficiency
  • Universal access
  • Resource allocation
  • Quality of care
  • Queue skipping
  • Economic impact
  • Ethical considerations
  • Accessibility
  • Public investment
  • Health outcomes
  • Social inequality
  • Health insurance
  • Privilege
  • Funding
  • Resource distribution
What to do next:
Look at other essays: