It will be better to have wide use of driverless cars for individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Recently,

driverless

cars

have become a trend which is advocated to be used personally and socially.

However

, I totally disagree with

this

opinion as there may be potential risks for using them.

To begin

with, in terms of technical issues,

driverless

cars

have not developed to a trustworthy standard that we can fully rely on. The

driverless

systems of

cars

are mostly driven by radar or intelligent vision identification. If they encounter a computer crash, the car will get out of control which will put both passengers and pedestrians in danger, causing injury or even death.

Conversely

, the mechanical car is simpler than

cars

that require complex calculating volume, having less chance of experiencing automatic mistakes.

As a result

, traditional

cars

are still safer than self-driven

cars

at present.

On the other hand

, some people may argue that

driverless

cars

might reduce the cost of using them.

However

, both individuals and society will spend more on other aspects practically. From an individual perspective,

due to

the lack of confidence in intelligent vehicles, the expense of insurance is higher than normal ones, which would probably heavy the excessive burden on families during the economic crisis. On the social level, a huge amount of replacement

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

drivers might cause a rise in the unemployment rate, being a negative sign that will trigger large-scale protests.

For instance

, the low-price competition in

driverless

taxi

Fix the agreement mistake

taxis

show examples

will aggravate the conflict between Uber drivers and

driverless

companies. In conclusion,

although

the

driverless

car is an option to change people's lifestyle, it has not been completely proven safe. Meanwhile, the side effects in other aspects are still worth being carefully concerned.