Some people believe that paying taxes is enough for their social contribution. Others believe that people should have more responsibilities to society.

There has been an ongoing debate regarding the extent of individuals’ responsibilities toward society. Some argue that paying

taxes

is a sufficient contribution,

while

others contend that the previous stance is only the bare minimum. In my opinion,

while

paying

taxes

is a fundamental civic

duty

, people should dedicate more effort to creating a more harmonious and supportive society. On the one hand, those who believe that paying

taxes

is sufficient belong to the school of thought that it is the

duty

of the government to provide essential services

such

as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. They claim that by fulfilling their tax obligations, financial contributions are made to the common good and ensure the smooth functioning of government institutions. European nations, especially Scandinavian ones, are often used as shining examples of how

taxes

are the primary source of revenue for funding public services that benefit the population, regardless of their personal income.

However

, despite these arguments, I believe that

this

approach is flawed because relying solely on

taxes

as the only form of social contribution overestimates the ability, reach, and efficiency of state-run programs.

On the other hand

, I advocate for individuals to take on a more proactive role.

This

is primarily because it is impossible for official institutions to cover all edge cases that require a safety net. A compelling example of

this

can be seen in a study by Harvard University, which illustrates the significance of private charity even in a developed country like the USA.

Thus

, we can reasonably infer that in developing countries the role of initiatives in providing support for others is remarkably more crucial.

Moreover

, even when it is not a necessity to help the downtrodden, people can still make a constructive impact.

For instance

, hiking trails and parks in Australia are maintained by volunteers. Based on these arguments and evidence,

this

approach towards personal social responsibility is the better one. Critics may argue that the majority might not be able to attempt

this

type of endeavour

due to

the time constraints of professional and familial obligations.

While

this

concern is valid to some extent, it can be mitigated by a reduction of scale. Namely, it is quite easy for anyone to assist others in their neighbourhood for a couple of hours weekly or contribute a few dollars to the local veteran group.

Furthermore

, these actions not only provide external benefits to the community

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

internal benefits to the person who conducts them. Engaging in helpful activities is a source of pride and satisfaction, which is essential for the mental health status of the person involved.

Therefore

,

although

there are concerns regarding the feasibility of extra social

duty

beyond

taxes

, the advantages of personal attempts to make a positive difference far outweigh the downsides. In conclusion, paying

taxes

should only be considered as the baseline of social

duty

. By engaging in volunteer work and practising socially responsible behaviours, people can have a more direct and meaningful impact on their communities.

This

holistic approach to social contribution is essential for building a more resilient society

as well as

a community with members of good character.