Write about the following topic: Some people think it is more important to spend public money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems such as railways and trams. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
It is an eternal paradox that the
resources
at our disposal are limited, while
we have numerous projects desperately needing these resources
. How to allocate resources
between motorways and railways is not an exception. From my perspective, society should invest more in public transport
systems
as this
suggests both a caress for the disadvantaged and the determination to protect the environment.
It is easy to understand why the inclination of resources
on railways can protect the environment. According to
the latest report from the UN, waste from cars is one of the most serious air pollutants that has worsened the Greenhouse Effect. Hence
, if we lead more people to use private cars less often by providing sophisticated and convenient public transport
systems
, we are definitely making contributions to the improvement of the environment.
Apart from reducing air pollution, enhancing public transport
systems
can also
suggest human caring for the disadvantaged, such
as those workers in developing countries. They usually struggle on the subsistence line, and it is more desirable for them to improve public transport
systems
rather than construct roads for cars which they can not afford. Admittedly everyone’s needs are worthwhile to be considered, including the wealthy, but the bottom line of civilisations is decided by our caring for vulnerable groups. Therefore
, I am inclined to build more railways.
To summarise, given that spending public money on public transport
systems
can not only alleviate the Greenhouse Effect but also
improve the living conditions of the vulnerable, I argue that this
investment deserves to be considered seriously and carefully.Submitted by hx88375757 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider using more specific examples to add more weight to the arguments presented. For instance, mentioning specific countries or cities that have benefited from improved public transportation systems could enhance your points.
coherence cohesion
While the essay is coherent, further emphasis on linking different sections together and ensuring a tighter flow would improve it. For example, explicitly mentioning how improved public transport has directly benefited the environment or disadvantaged individuals in separate segments could strengthen the cohesion.
general
There are a few minor language inaccuracies, such as 'a caress for the disadvantaged,' which should be 'care for the disadvantaged.' Paying more attention to these small details can elevate the quality of the writing.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear and well-structured argument in favor of investing in public transport systems over roads and motorways.
coherence cohesion
The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion and the conclusion aptly summarizes the main points.
coherence cohesion
Coherence and cohesion are maintained throughout the essay through logical progression and smooth transitions.