It is impossible to help all the people in the world who are in need, so governments should focus on people from their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that governments should prioritize their own people over others, as it is not possible to help all human beings on the planet.
This
essay totally disagrees with the statement because it is an immoral thing to do and extending assistance boosts the economy too. Countries should stand by each other in need. If not,
then
they are going against their moral code of conduct. It will be a crime if a neighbouring state is under any form of crisis and seeking help, but others are turning a blind eye to them. Evidences are recorded in history that whenever nations have assisted one another it has only boosted their bilateral relationship.
For instance
, India's philanthropic act of providing PPE kits to everyone in the world during the 2020 pandemic is regarded highly as a moral act which in turn has made it stand out from the rest as benevolent. Now, India is slowly becoming someone whom everybody wants to be a friend with.
Moreover
, sending reform measures to other nations
also
boosts the supporting country's economy in the long run. Trade relations will be built over the years, and subsidized goods and commodities will be imported leading to increased affordability. Allowing immigration from the deprived region will increase demand and
hence
, financial health increases too.
For example
, through China's Belt and Road initiative, adjacent nations have benefited from infrastructures that were
then
suffering from a lack of it.
This
has even fostered trade relations among the participants with China coming out as the supreme benefactor. In conclusion, It is morally and financially beneficial for sovereign states to assist those in need and the idea of restricting
this
within the confines of their own border is flawed.
Submitted by majumdarnilesh21 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
While the essay provides a strong response to the task with clear and comprehensive ideas, it would benefit from an additional paragraph to fully cover potential counterarguments and strengthen the discussion. Considering both sides would make the argument more robust and balanced.
coherence and cohesion
The logical flow of the essay is generally clear, but transitioning phrases between paragraphs could be more varied to enhance coherence. For example, using phrases such as 'In addition to...,' or 'However' could improve the transitions.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear structure with a distinct introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. This helps to present the ideas in an organized manner, aiding reader understanding.
task achievement
The use of relevant and specific examples, such as India's response during the 2020 pandemic and China's Belt and Road initiative, effectively supports the main points, making the argument more convincing.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resources
  • moral obligation
  • global stability
  • economic impact
  • domestic issues
  • international aid
  • diplomatic relationships
  • resource allocation
  • healthcare
  • education
  • infrastructure
  • national priorities
  • desperate need
  • indirect benefit
  • goodwill
What to do next:
Look at other essays: