With the overwhelming proliferation of mass
surveillance
and
data gatheringAdd a hyphen
show examples
technology, many individuals have raised ethical questions concerning the infringement of personal privacy. Supporters,
on the other hand
, debate that national
safety
necessitates
such
scrutiny of citizens. In
this
essay, both viewpoints will be thoroughly discussed, after which my own stance will be provided and substantiated.
On the one hand, critics of governmental monitoring and
data
amassing argue that
such
surveillance
tends to expose scrutinized citizens to distress and abuse. Multiple tools,
such
as biometrics, communications interception, and closed-circuit television cameras are utilized by some
authorityFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to monitor and record knowledge about individuals surreptitiously on a massive scale. The non-uniqueness and immutability of information may facilitate illegal disclosure to third parties, who are prone to ply
such
data
resources for other reasons. A manifest example
forChange preposition
show examples
this
phenomenon is identity theft, which has resulted in immense cash losses, bankruptcy, and a lowered sense of public
safety
. Given the severity and complexity of those crimes, citizens are eligible to think that the perceived public good at the expense of their personal privacy may not justify the pernicious impact deriving from unfettered government
surveillance
.
On the other hand
, a school of thought held by advocates is that
joined upAdd a hyphen
show examples
surveillance
and information harvesting can elevate national security
as well as
enhance public health. In terms of citizens’
safety
, the majority of monitoring devices, one of which is CCTV cameras, help the authority exert more crime control through the reinforcement of an epistemic asymmetry.
For example
, providing that many cameras are hidden in plain sight, innocent pedestrians may not necessarily notice them;
however
, potential criminals will be effectively deterred by their unnerving presence , ensuring the well-being of nearby inhabitants. Another point in
favorChange the spelling
show examples
of government
surveillance
is its indispensable part in disease prevention in the form of contact tracing and vaccine recordings. Without medical information reaped from individuals, numerous health goals,
such
as disease control, would hardly be fulfilled.
In conclusion, given the indisputable importance of mass
surveillance
and
data
collection in improving the
nations’Correct your spelling
show examples
safety
and healthcare conditions,
promotionCorrect article usage
show examples
of
such
systems is advisable.
However
, the present ways of conduct are still highly susceptible to misuse, which, from my perspective, can be bettered through the specification of the locations, methods, and purposes of
data
collection.
Such
clarity helps the government avert the risk of eroding the right to privacy
while
maintaining the aforementioned
safety
benefits.