Companies that use fossil fuels should be taxed more than companies that use green energies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that organizations that

use

Use synonyms

fossil fuels should be taxed more, compared to those who

use

Use synonyms

renewable energy sources.

This

Linking Words

essay completely agrees with the statement because it reduces pollution and is economically beneficial to the

government

Use synonyms

. States should impose more duties on companies using non-renewable energy sources for running their operations. As the taxes go up, the operational cost

also

Linking Words

increases.

Therefore

Linking Words

, in order to remain profitable, these organizations would turn to a more eco-friendly method of conducting their businesses.

As a result

Linking Words

, the pollution level of the country would go down.

For example

Linking Words

, since 2015, TCS's policy of keeping its business 15% dependent on solar energy has reduced its carbon footprint significantly.

Moreover

Linking Words

, the extra tariffs imposed on the companies using coal and petroleum will have economic benefits for the

government

Use synonyms

. These taxes will be added to the

government

Use synonyms

's revenue, which in turn can be used in other sectors like healthcare, which always requires investment to meet the ever-changing medical standards.

For instance

Linking Words

, the

government

Use synonyms

of India's record collection of GST in

this

Linking Words

financial year has enabled the finance minister to improve the budget allocated for health care. In conclusion, mandating duties on corporations that

use

Use synonyms

coal and petroleum to run their businesses will be a good initiative because it will encourage them to

use

Use synonyms

green energies, ultimately lowering the pollution level, and will bring the

government

Use synonyms

monetary benefits which can be utilized in other areas that need it.