In some countries police officers do not carry guns. How does this affect the manner they implement law and order? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a gun. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In some nations,
officers
of the law
do not have weapons
with them which has many crucial impacts on their way of applying the law
. In this
essay, I will explain the benefits and drawbacks of this
action.
To begin
with, police
officers
who do not carry guns
show that in the country they live in the level of security is high. Additionally
, people
who live there also
cooperate with the police
which makes it easy work for officers
to implement law
and order. For example
: in Sweden officers
of the law
do not have weapons
with them because people
do not break the law
and have high make work easy for police
. This
level of safety makes the government think their policies do not need guns
for applying for orders and it people
will have a better life if there is not any weapon carrying there.
On the other hand
, carrying weapons
for officers
is crucial because of the countries they live in. For instance
: in my country people
break the law
and do not care about it mostly gangsters carry guns
with them and police
must have weapons
to defend and apply orders. Therefore
, in some nations carrying guns
is pivotal not only for the implementation of the law
but also
the for safety of the police
.
In conclusion, most people
believe that police
should carry guns
with them to support them in bad situations and also
to implement the law
but some societies which have better people
and do not break the order of their governments do not see any reason for a carry of guns
.Submitted by abdullahhabibi9999 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To improve the task achievement score, consider providing more concrete examples and elaborating on them to make your points more persuasive.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a logical structure, but it would benefit from more cohesive devices or transition words to ensure a smoother flow of ideas between sentences and paragraphs.
coherence cohesion
While the introduction and conclusion are present and adequate, placing stronger emphasis on summarizing the key points discussed can draw a more persuasive conclusion.
task achievement
The essay addresses the prompt and discusses both advantages and disadvantages, which shows a balanced approach.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clear and serve their purpose well in providing a framework for the essay.