Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe the government should control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years, most

people

have used fresh

water

in their daily lives,

while

some

people

have not been allowed to access and resources of clean

water

have been limited. Personally, I insist that everybody should an able to attend fresh

water

; support will be illustrated in the following paragraphs: First and foremost, citizens should be allowed a

quality

of life. In many countries,

people

need to pay tax on average with their income. They should have equality to

use

standard facilities and have the right to access clean

water

. In my perspective, the government should improve the

quality

of

water

to be fresh and adequate for

people

to

use

in their lives and occupations.

For instance

, The Prachachon Party of Thailand has a policy to improve the

quality

of

water

in the countryside–leading to

people

in remote areas being able to access fresh

water

.

On the other hand

, clearing

water

is limited which affects the environment. In many areas, groundwater has been pulled for living and careering

such

as consumption, agriculture, and others which affects biodiversity in forests–leading to dead and draining soil. In my opinion, the government should encourage innovations to find new opportunities for

water

.

For example

, Singapore is able to develop technology which changes seawater into cleaning

water

.

As a result

, when fresh

water

is adequate for

people

to

use

, they can reduce the need to

use

water

under the land. As I mentioned, even though the resources of

water

are adequate.

However

, everybody has the right to

use

fresh

water

, which is an equality of humans.

Therefore

, the government should solve

this

problem by improving the

quality

of

water

and developing technology to replace old resources.