It is impossible to help all the people in the world who are in need, so governments should focus on people from their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Is it right to say that the government should stick to regional issues
instead
of thinking globally? As a matter of fact, it can be said that it is not possible to help folks on the world level when they are in need and legislation should take care of their concerned regions only. To my mind, I strongly disagree with
this
statement. The following paragraphs will shed light on my perspective
along with
the supportive examples. To start with, sharing is not known as caring for no reason. If two nations take care of each other in their downs
then
it will spread the sense of love and affection.
This
practice will not only make strong national ties but
also
portray the ethical code of conduct of a particular country.
For example
, during COVID-19 India helped Pakistan by providing them with free PPE kits, so that doctors can treat the infected individuals.
As a result
, the relationship between these two regions became stronger, and many more provinces tried to get in touch with India.
Hence
, when the government helps other tribes individuals
then
it enhances the reputation and harmony on the world level.
Furthermore
, the strong nationwide links can bring numerous advantages in terms of economy as well. When two tribes have a good communal bond,
then
there are better opportunities for trade and business, which ultimately encourages the federal financial situation. To exemplify, an article in "The Tribune" written by Director-in-chief Mr. Walker has said that Bangladesh gained an economic rise in their GDP after having good relations with China.
This
only happened after Bangladesh supported China during the swine flu by providing them with medication services internationally. Eventually, helping the public from different nationalities can have the fact of global stability in terms of finances. In conclusion,
although
prioritizing domestic needs is the primary duty of every federal body,
yet
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
spending resources on the other nation's folks is the ever best practice that will bring prosperity and economic stability to society
; and
Change the punctuation
, and
;
show examples
will make the earth a better place to live for mankind.
Submitted by knavdeep3011 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Though your essay has a strong logical structure with clear topic sentences and paragraphs, be mindful of minor grammatical mistakes and awkward phrasing to ensure higher fluency and accuracy. For example, 'down' instead of 'downs,' and 'share is caring' could be more elegantly phrased.
task achievement
Your essay effectively addresses the task prompt and provides relevant examples, but to achieve a higher score, ensure that your examples are seamlessly integrated into the argument, adding more depth and context.
introduction conclusion present
Your essay has a well-structured introduction and conclusion, which helps in presenting a coherent argument.
supported main points
You have effectively supported your main points with relevant examples, such as the instance of India helping Pakistan during COVID-19 and the Bangladesh-China economic relationship.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resources
  • moral obligation
  • global stability
  • economic impact
  • domestic issues
  • international aid
  • diplomatic relationships
  • resource allocation
  • healthcare
  • education
  • infrastructure
  • national priorities
  • desperate need
  • indirect benefit
  • goodwill
What to do next:
Look at other essays: