Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend to you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that governments should allocate more resources to the development of railways rather than roads.
Although
some might disagree with this
statement, I fully agree with this
statement because trains offer more efficient transportation of goods and people, are more cost-effective, and are significantly better for the environment. This
essay will examine these points in detail to support my opinion.
To begin
with, one of the primary reasons governments should invest in railroads is their superior efficiency in transporting large volumes of both goods and passengers. Unlike road-based logistics, which are limited by the capacity of individual vehicles, freight trains can move huge quantities over long distances with fewer trips. For instance
, China’s extensive high-speed rail network has revolutionized both passenger travel and the transportation of essential commodities, reducing travel time and increasing the flow of goods across the country. Thus
, this
factor can almost single-handedly express my view.
Moreover
, metros are more cost-effective in the long term. Whereas
surface networks are crucial for short distances, they are more expensive to maintain and rely heavily on fossil fuels, such
as petrol and diesel, which are costly and subject to price fluctuations. In contrast
, railcars, especially electric ones, are cheaper to operate and maintain, particularly for long-distance. To illustrate, India, where millions of people rely on the railway system daily is the most affordable and accessible means of transport, not only for individuals but also
for businesses that depend on low-cost freight services. Hence
, this
factor clearly justifies my point of view.
Another key reason to prioritize rail lines is their environmental benefits. As global awareness of climate change grows, reducing greenhouse gas emissions has become a critical issue. Subways, especially those powered by electricity, contribute far less to pollution compared to motor vehicles. Like French TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse) operates entirely on electricity and emits very little carbon dioxide, offering a sustainable alternative to road transportation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that governments should focus more on developing railway infrastructure rather than expanding land networks. Rail infrastructure not only offers greater efficiency and cost savings but also
represents a more sustainable and environmentally friendly option. Therefore
, prioritizing railways is a wise decision that will benefit both economies and the planet in the long term.Submitted by tsarfraz170 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Make sure to vary sentence structures to maintain reader interest and demonstrate language proficiency.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that the ideas in each paragraph transition smoothly to enhance readability.
task achievement
Include a counterargument to show a balanced view and then refute it to strengthen your position.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, each fulfilling its role effectively.
task achievement
The main points are well developed and supported with relevant examples, making the argument robust and compelling.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?