The large amount of time and money that is spent on conserving wildlife would be better spent on improving the lives of humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Wildlife has always been an essential part of our
ecosystem
Use synonyms
,
thus
Linking Words
, it has to be protected. Nowadays, it is often said that it is beneficial to donate
money
Use synonyms
to conserve the environment. At the same time,
however
Linking Words
, others believe that
such
Linking Words
money
Use synonyms
would be better spent on topics related to humans, namely, decreasing the costs of life, developing social care, etc.
While
Linking Words
each of these views has both pros and cons, I believe that it is more beneficial to protect
nature
Use synonyms
rather than humans. Wildlife is the foundation of our
ecosystem
Use synonyms
,
hence
Linking Words
, by conserving it we
also
Linking Words
take care of ourselves. Everything that
lives
Use synonyms
on the Earth is connected with each other;
therefore
Linking Words
, it is crucial not to allow fauna and flora to extinct as
such
Linking Words
a scenario would be disastrous for us as well. If the Earth was deprived of wild
nature
Use synonyms
, it wouldn't be suitable for settlements anymore since the
ecosystem
Use synonyms
would collapse.
As a result
Linking Words
, each possible action, including
money
Use synonyms
donations, should be taken in order to protect it.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, there have been many significant problems associated with human life that should be solved too. Rising costs of living, improvement of social care, and getting rid of hunger in undeveloped countries are just a few examples of
this
Linking Words
.
Consequently
Linking Words
, the
money
Use synonyms
that is
Linking Words
allocated to
nature
Use synonyms
's protection could, at least partly, improve the conditions of
lives
Use synonyms
of thousands of people all over the world.
However
Linking Words
,
such
Linking Words
an approach, despite its strengths, would be disastrous for us as the unprotected
nature
Use synonyms
would easily to extinct,
consequently
Linking Words
endangering our
lives
Use synonyms
as well. In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that the
money
Use synonyms
spent on conserving wildlife should be allocated to the development of human
lives
Use synonyms
.
While
Linking Words
such
Linking Words
money
Use synonyms
could improve the living conditions of many people, at the same time it would leave the fauna and flora unprotected endangering the
ecosystem
Use synonyms
as well as
Linking Words
our
lives
Use synonyms
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Consider including more specific examples to support your points. This will help strengthen your argument and make it more persuasive.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. Consider using linking words to enhance coherence and make your essay easier to follow.
coherence cohesion
The essay includes a clear introduction and conclusion, effectively setting up your argument and summarizing your points.
task achievement
You effectively tackled both perspectives on the issue and provided a balanced discussion before stating your position, which shows a good understanding of the task.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystems
  • sustainable development
  • ecotourism
  • climate change
  • endangered species
  • ethical responsibility
  • interconnected
  • expenditure
  • psychological benefits
  • health benefits
  • natural environments
What to do next:
Look at other essays: