Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued whether the punishments for any criminal act should be based on the motives behind it and the circumstances involved or should be pre-decided for each category.
While
defining a
punishment for each kind of Remove the article
apply
crime
seems logical from the aspect of a judiciary, I believe it is more important to stay flexible and look at the degree of the crime
before deciding the punishment in order to be fair to the victim.
On the one hand, it makes sense for the legislative authorities to assign punishments for each type of crime
. Without this
bifurcation, things may look bizarre. It would give a hierarchial
view to the public; minor thefts would get fined or a terminal jail, Correct your spelling
hierarchical
whereas
terrorist activities like the one which happened on 9/11 would lead to direct encounter
or Fix the agreement mistake
encounters
a
life imprisonment.
Remove the article
apply
On the other hand
, looking at the degree of the act is extremely important. Consider a sexual assault for instance
. Within this
category, there are heinous sub-categories which lead to grave mental and physical damage to the victims and their families. In such
cases, it is only fair that the assaulters are subjected to forms of punishment worse than usual. The other way around is also
true. If a minor theft was conducted by a teenager from a poor family out of starvation, then
it should not be fined like other critical thefts, infact ways must be discovered to instil value among them and provide for resources. For example
, in 2014, an incident by the name of “Nirbhaya” became infamous globally because of the nature of the gang assault committed against a college student. People came out on streets
protesting and demanding maximum Correct article usage
the streets
term
for the convicts, which ultimately led to a change in law for Fix the agreement mistake
terms
such
crimes.
In conclusion, although
assigning the punishments as per the type of offence may look logical, I firmly believe it is only fair to the victims and their families that the situation, cause, and degree of the crime
is looked into.Submitted by man3meet4 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence
Improve the coherence between some paragraphs by ensuring that all ideas flow logically from one to the next. Consider using linking words like 'furthermore' and 'additionally' more frequently to help with this.
task
Strengthen your examples by offering more specific details or case studies where applicable.
conclusion
Ensure your conclusion succinctly summarizes your main argument while reinforcing your opinion.
task
Your essay provides a balanced discussion of both views, effectively addressing all parts of the task.
coherence
The ideas are clearly organized with a good progression, making it easy for the reader to follow.
task
You provide relevant examples to support your main points, which helps to strengthen your argument.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!