With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the growth of middle classes around the world, ownership of motor cars has become much more common, particularly for those who reside in large urban areas. It has been argued that free public
transport
should be provided in these metropolises as a method to curb the amount of polluted air
and traffic congestion. This
essay will explain why this
approach should not be undertaken for cost
and mobility reasons.
The reasons for not providing free public transport
for urban residents are diverse. Firstly
, there would be a significant cost
for the government to pay for this
, meaning they would have no option but to raise taxes for individuals rather than for industry which produces more pollution. Secondly
, this
would be unfair for
those who need to use vehicles for more door-to-door travel, Change preposition
to
such
as people who live far from train and bus stations or those who need to carry many things with them. Furthermore
, if public transport
is free, there would be overcrowding on trains and buses, meaning that people simply replace one type of inconvenience for another.
Looking at the argument from a cost
perspective, even though there is an initial financial advantage for commuters with savings made on fuel, at some point down the track this
would be lost, as municipal governments would have no choice but to raise taxes to pay for the construction, management and maintenance of public transport
facilities. If the funds allocated to this
were invested in how to make vehicles greener instead
, such
as with electric cars, the issue of air
pollution would be addressed in a more cost
-effective way. For example
, the city of Taiyuan in China now has better air
quality partly due to
the investment they made in electric taxis and buses.
To summarise, free public transport
is not a viable option to reduce road blockages and improve air
quality, as there are better cost efficient
ways to do Add a hyphen
cost-efficient
this
and the mobility issues it can cause. Moving forward, cities around the world should adopt greener transport
options whether they be public or personal to ensure better traffic flow with fewer impurities in the air
.Submitted by Mrjit147 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider providing more balanced arguments. While the essay discusses reasons against free public transport effectively, it might reflect briefly on the opposing side to show depth.
coherence cohesion
Strengthen paragraph transitions to enhance flow. While the structure is logical, some connections between paragraphs could be smoother.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a well-defined introduction and conclusion, clearly framing your argument.
task achievement
The example of Taiyuan, China, effectively strengthens your position by providing a real-world context.
task achievement
Logical structure with clear main points and supporting details helps in delivering a comprehensive and compelling argument.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?