In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single- sex schools or co- educational schools. Some people think that children going to single sex schools have disadvantages later in life. To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays, parents prefer sending their kids to same-sex or mixed-sex

schools

. Some of them say that if children go to single-sex

schools

, it will be a disadvantage in later

life

. In my opinion, I can neither agree nor disagree with the statement for various reasons, which I am going to discuss in

further

paragraphs. I partly agree with the statement that co-ed

schools

provide better preparation

in

Change preposition

for

show examples

life

for kids.

Moreover

, the interaction they allow for the opposite gender can help the kid to develop their emotional intelligence and interpersonal relationships.

However

, co-ed

schools

also

play a role in building confidence and

communicational

Replace the word

communication

show examples

skills which are important skills for later in

life

.

For example

, the researchers at Oxford say that emotional intelligence

is mainly develop

Change the verb form

is mainly developed

is mainly developing

show examples

throughout the school years of a person's

life

.

On the other hand

, we can't deny that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

single-sex

schools

do provide merits on some basis.

Furthermore

, co-ed

schools

provide a comfortable and relaxed learning environment as everyone shares the same temperament as the same gender.

Besides

, it reduces the stereotypes and double standards, allowing them to focus more on their studies.

For instance

, research from Cambridge provides studies that, same-sex

schools

outperformed their co-ed academic mate by 40-50% in grades. In conclusion, both academics have their own merits and play significant roles in their interpersonal and psychological development for better performance and enhanced confidence throughout learning days.