In some counties, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, more and more
people
have difficulty with health
problems, such
as high blood pressure, diabetes, and so on because of various unhealthy foods. As a result
, some people
suggest the government should charge taxes related to food
or something. From my perspective, I partially disagree with this
idea.
People
who think the authorities need to impose a tax
on fast food
indicate excess intake of fried foods can cause the body to suffer plenty of diseases and it is impossible to prohibit eaters not to have this
kind of food
. However
, the government has to assume responsibility for the public well-being simultaneously. Therefore
, they have no option but to make alternative methods, that is
, to produce the law about tax
on unhealthy refreshments, which may inhibit consumers' desire for this
category of high-salt, high-fat stuff before they purchase them.
As far as I am concerned, if the authorities charge a fast-food
tax
in order to regulate the multitude's yearning for delicious, but greasy things in case those foods degrade our bodies, it may be futile because there are several reasons why people
have trouble in their health
, such
as less exercise, a degraded lifestyle, and so on. Additionally
, eating whatever kind of food
belongs to people
's will, the government does not have the right to add a tax
for this
purpose for everyone's body. It could bring about protests from people
who stand in a variety of positions. If the health
authority wants to improve the public's health
problems, it can resolve this
issue by publicizing the defects of fast food
and inculcating awareness of the need to care for health
.
In a nutshell, instilling knowledge and information about fried food
's influence on the body of the masses is important and thus
makes eaters become more health
-conscious. In addition
, I believe that avenue is way better and more effective than charging tax
on specific food
.Submitted by hayashidajinja820 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
You have addressed the task effectively, presenting a clear position on whether the government should impose higher taxes on fast food. However, to strengthen your response further, you could develop more specific examples or instances where taxation has been either beneficial or ineffective. This would help in demonstrating a deeper engagement with the topic.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay is logically structured with a clear introduction, main body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, try to ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly into the next to enhance the coherence. Using linking words effectively can help in achieving this.
coherence and cohesion
The essay introduces the topic clearly, stating your view on the imposition of tax on fast food. Your stance is well-expressed at the beginning, which sets a clear direction for your essay.
task response
You provide a good balance of arguments, considering both sides before offering your own opinion and conclusion. This approach shows a thorough understanding of the issue at hand.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!