Public transportation is a great way to travel, particularly within a metropolis. The metro is the most convenient way to get around the city. Do you agree or disagree?
In overpopulated cities, governments have been using public transportation as a way to deal with most traffic problems. One of the most popular solutions is to encourage citizens to ride public transport networks like the subway and some even consider it the best way to move around in big cities. I totally agree with
this
notion because of how it conserves time and money.
To begin
with, a well-designed underground network can save people an immense amount of travel duration and energy. In fact, subways are often built on their own route underground or high up, away from crowded places and traffic jams, leading to shorter commuting time. For example
, a high-speed train in Japan is built 20 metres underground and can reach 400km within an hour. Therefore
, travellers can move around the city in a significantly short hour without being interrupted by other road vehicles.
In addition
, it is more cost-effective for commuters to ride by subway on a regular basis. This
is because most public transportation companies offer fixed and budget-friendly prices for riders who commute on a daily basis on certain routes. As a result
, people can plan their trips ahead, mitigate unnecessary expenses and obviate any unwanted overspending. For instance
, according to
a survey by Bangkok Research Institute, fifty-two per cent of Thai citizens agree that they have more control over their travel budgets thanks to going to work by Skyline network than by other local transportation.
To sum up
, I contend that the underground has proved to be a great example of a modern and effective means of transport which alleviates the time and financial burdens caused by moving around in a metropolis. To ensure everyone benefits from this
, governments should allocate more sponsorship and resources to designing new modern networks and maintaining the existing ones.Submitted by thuthu.anhbui on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To improve, consider providing a more balanced view by discussing potential drawbacks or counterarguments to using the metro, which can enrich the discussion and demonstrate a higher level of critical engagement with the topic.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. While the essay flows well overall, some linking phrases or sentences could enhance the reading experience.
coherence cohesion
Use more varied sentence structures and vocabulary to improve the essay's linguistic range and flexibility. This will help avoid any repetition and maintain the reader's interest.
task achievement
The essay presents a thorough argument in favor of using the metro, with convincing reasons centered on saving time and money.
coherence cohesion
The structure of the essay is clear, with a good introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Each section has a clear purpose and contributes effectively to the overall argument.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as Japan's high-speed train and survey data from Bangkok, effectively supports the main points and provides real-world context.