The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Technology and

science

, per se, have made us what we are,

master

Fix the agreement mistake

masters

show examples

of the universe, springing from control of fire at first to state-of-the-art inventions, e.g., aeroplanes and AIs. These technologies, whether tangible or intangible, have allowed our

lives

to become more convenient and comfortable. Admitting that it is a matter of relativity how we consider the aim of

science

, the answer varies from person to person, depending on the value systems or personal traits. All in all, I totally agree with the statement for two reasons. First and foremost, I reckon that the primary purpose of

science

is to maintain people’s health.

For example

, as medical technologies develop, many diagnostic equipment,

such

as MRIs and X-ray imaging systems, have been invented to identify the cause of disease at the initial stage. These innovations enable us to live longer than before, in a healthy state, and contribute to improving our

lives

.

Secondly

, but not less importantly,

science

, especially agriculture, has encouraged a food supply, i.e.,

science

strongly supports a fundamental part of our

lives

to survive by itself.

For instance

, modern agriculture makes it possible to grow crops in every season with greenhouses, controlling the best temperature for them.

Thus

,

this

solution dramatically improves the lack of food. That having been mentioned, I would like to hasten to add the disadvantages of modern technology,

such

as global warming caused by using oil.

However

, I believe that the essence of

science

definitely contributes to our

lives

and well-being, but we have to reconsider that it is one of the members that a human is, living on the planet.