Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree?.
The issue of inequality has been the subject of heated debates for over a millennia. Undoubtedly, the idea that some people receive more than they deserve is not novel and is supported by many.
This
way of thinking has found its way into the field of creativity and self-expression. Many critics believe that some modern artists earn enormous amounts of finances Linking Words
while
others are left behind in poverty; Linking Words
thus
, Linking Words
this
situation should be changed with the involvement of the government. Linking Words
This
essay will provide an evaluation of the issue supported by arguments.
Linking Words
Overall
, I would strongly disagree with Linking Words
this
opinion.
To start with, I find the idea of governmental interference quite unethical. Despite the fact that many people do not find modern art appealing, trying to enforce their own judgements and supporting less successful authors to equalise the industry is unfair. The unfairness stems from the fact that most of the artists are on mostly even playfield. Everyone has to work extremely hard and show their best creatively. Linking Words
Moreover
, the majority of customers and connoisseurs have chosen certain creators over others and solidified their choices by voting with their wallets. Linking Words
Therefore
, the involvement of officials would imply that their opinion is more valuable and that they should be able to decide who is supposed to receive financial support and who is not.
Linking Words
Additionally
, the second argument that disproves governmental support is connected with the effective allocation of resources. Spending taxpayer's money is an important process that requires thorough consideration and the ability to see the bigger picture. Linking Words
While
art is an integral part of culture and society, allocating funds for the support of less-known artists may be irresponsible for several reasons. Linking Words
Firstly
, that may lead to scammers exploiting the system to receive welfare; Linking Words
secondly
, these resources could serve a better purpose. Linking Words
For example
, many regions in my country (Linking Words
such
as Tula and Ryazan regions) have underdeveloped infrastructure. Linking Words
Thus
, spending funds on these
improvements would yield much better results and help more citizens.
Linking Words
To sum up
, even though art is essential to humans, it is important to understand that it is not the domain where government should be involved. Linking Words
While
allocating some funds to develop Linking Words
overall
culture may be helpful and may indirectly assist many creators. Intervening too much may lead to dire
consequences.Linking Words
Submitted by khotkina.ma on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider using specific examples to further illustrate your points. This will strengthen your argument and provide a clearer context for your claims.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that all points are thoroughly connected. While the essay is well-organized, linking words and phrases can enhance flow and connectivity.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a strong introduction and conclusion that clearly outline the writer's position regarding governmental intervention in art funding.
task achievement
The argument against government involvement is well-developed, reflecting comprehensive ideas that are clearly and logically presented.
coherence cohesion
The essay is logically structured, progressing smoothly from one paragraph to the next, helping to maintain the reader's engagement.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.