Instead of requiring primary school students to do experiments themselves, schools should only allow them to watch experiments demonstrated by teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is an opinion that asserts a lot on the issue of whether

experiments

should be done by

students

or teachers in primary schools.Some men and women would suggest that it is their

students

Change noun form

student's

students'

show examples

right to examine since it enhances children's comprehension in many sciences;

however

, my personal attitude toward

this

is that experimenting by

students

may cause many dangers that will harm them,

instead

,teachers must do many examinations as they have more experience than

students

.I will present two principal reasons in the next paragraphs. One point , which I probably believe in favour of examining many

experiments

by teachers, is the fact that the experience that they have done hundreds of times.

For example

, in many subjects

such

as chemistry, schools require equipment to achieve

experiments

successfully,but, in many Asian societies,

this

issue does not care;

on the other hand

, more than 90 per cent of

students

are not familiar with most of the equipment that may harm

students

.

However

, experimenting by

students

can provide them with an insight into their comprehensive skills in many majors .

In addition

,

students

can test their ability by doing

experiments

which makes them confident, though,

this

situation requires a teacher as a leader.

For example

, many tests in physics can be done by

students

, which enhances their comprehension of theory modules and results in making ideas. In conclusion,

however

, it is beneficial to allow

students

to do many

experiments

,it could have a responsibility for primary schools, in fact, they could watch for the first time and

then

by getting permission from their teacher could do the tests.