It is so difficult for little ordinary people can do to improve the environmental problems today. Therefore, the state leader and big companies should be taking charge of solving the amount of environment damage. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Nowadays, it seems difficult for small
people
to solve environmental
problems
.
Hence
, big companies and leaders of a state should take part in solving the amount of environmental damage. In my opinion, I really agree with the latter statement because they need to be responsible for their actions and have the capital to solve these
problems
quickly compared to ordinary
people
.
To begin
with, ordinary
people
cannot participate in solving environmental
problems
due to
the lack of time that they have because they need to work or study.
Moreover
, small
people
can only participate on doing strikes which is considered a cheaper way to solve the
problems
.
For instance
, Greta Thurnberg a teenager skips her class only to do a climate strike in front of the parliament's building.
As a result
, the impact is considered small until large
people
come to participate which can drive the government to take action.
On the other hand
, state leaders and big corporations are responsible for the cause of their actions. It starts from the mass destruction of their operations which can destroy the forest
along with
the lack of firm regulations. If the big company wants to open land for agriculture, they need to destroy the forest and can do it freely because they already paid regulated
tax
Fix the agreement mistake
taxes
show examples
. These actions will leave an impact on the environment and local
people
that live near the corporate's lands.
Moreover
, governments and big corporations have lots of capital to fund environmental restorations that come from their CSR funds and taxes received by the governments.
For instance
, they can use CSR funds or tax to resolve environmental
problems
quickly and can create a bigger impact. In conclusion,
although
ordinary
people
can take a small part in solving environmental
problems
, I really agree that the leaders and the big corporations should take a bigger responsibility because they have the power and funds to solve the
problems
quickly.
Submitted by alyalihan28 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

clear comprehensive ideas
Ensure that your main points are consistently supported with additional examples or evidence, which can better demonstrate your argument. This will enhance the comprehensiveness of your ideas.
logical structure
While your essay is well-organized, ensure that your transitions between ideas and paragraphs are always smooth and seamless.
introduction conclusion present
Your essay effectively introduces the topic and clearly states your opinion, making it easy for the reader to understand your stance from the beginning.
relevant specific examples
You provide strong examples, such as the case of Greta Thunberg, which help to illustrate your points and make your argument more persuasive.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • State leader
  • Big companies
  • Environmental policies
  • Regulations
  • Pollution
  • Green technology
  • Sustainable practices
  • Carbon emissions
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Individual actions
  • Recycling
  • Energy consumption
  • Eco-friendly products
  • Collective impact
  • Collaboration
  • Partnership
  • Education and awareness
  • Informed citizens
  • Policy change
  • Personal responsibility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: