Some people say zoos are cruelty to wild animals,while others think they can only be protected there.To what extent do you agree?

The number of

zoos

has been significantly increasing so that, they are now commonly available all around the world.There is an inconclusive debate as to whether

zoos

have mistreated wildlife or they have provided good protection.From my perspective,I strongly think

zoos

have many benefits and those wild creatures have been pampered well in there for many reasons.

To begin

with,some people may argue that

zoos

treat those animals improperly causing them to suffer from hunger and keeping them in limited spaces which is not their natural behaviour.Those creatures are supposed to live freely in the forest not to be restrained.

In contrast

,from my experience,In order to attract many tourists,many

zoos

have treated those animals well.They are provided with good food and good hygiene.

Furthermore

,it can be said that many

species

of animal might have become extinct now

due to

human industrialization.Many factories and built-up areas have invaded the green spaces causing many wildlife to lose their habitats.Some people think that we have an ethical responsibility to preserve those

species

.

Thus

,many

zoos

have been constructed to keep those

species

alive.

For instance

,Rhinoceros are rarely seen in the forest and on the verge of extinction.

However

,those are well-preserved at

zoos

and we are hoping that they can reproduce.

Additionally

,Because of many rare animal

species

make

zoos

to be a tourist attraction.

For example

,In my country,a young hippopotamus named Moodeng is surprisingly very famous and generates a lot of income for Thai

zoos

. In conclusion,nowadays

zoos

are crucial for preserving endangered

species

and wildlife tourism can be a sustainable source of income for many countries.In order to attract tourists those animals have been treated well.