Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

The question of who can receive a scholarship from government funding has long been a topic of argument in several countries. Some believe that support should only be used for

students

who choose

subjects

which are crucial to the development of human societies.

Although

this

educational

policy

has both positive and negative effects, I am convinced that the benefits will be far away from the drawbacks because it will encourage more young

people

to choose

subjects

that may not help them get rich in the

future

but will help reduce the imbalance of the workforce in different

fields

and play an essential role in the stable development of the

society

.  First of all,

this

policy

will help to maintain the balance of the

future

workforce. There is a reality that most

students

want to choose majors that can help them have a well-paid job after graduating from a university

such

as administration, finance, or technology. Not many youngsters want to study history or geography because they will hardly find a good job in the

future

. So, if there were no financial aid from states, most

students

would apply for economic or technology majors, and

this

would cause a

lack

of lecturers in these

subjects

but unemployment in others, and there would be a redundancy of

laborers

Change the spelling

labourers

show examples

in these

fields

in the

future

which would be a burden to families and

society

.

For instance

, most young

people

in Viet Nam in the early 2000s chose administration or finance as their majors and not many chose engineering,

as a consequence

, a lot of graduated

students

could not find a job and had to work in a quite different field with very low salary, which was considered a waste of time and money.

Furthermore

,

this

policy

also

plays a vital role in helping human

society

develop stably. It is because without financial support from the government, there might be very few

people

who choose those

subjects

, and there would be a

lack

of officers in some

fields

which would cause problems for human

society

. Young

people

nowadays do not tend to pay school fees to study archaeology, geography, or history, and if there were no scholarship, there would be a

lack

of experts in those

fields

in the near

future

. It is evident that in several provinces in Viet Nam, there is now a

lack

of officers in some

fields

and

that is

challenging government leaders in seeking suitable solutions to tackle

this

issue. In conclusion, despite some possible disadvantages of

this

policy

, I believe human

society

will be more beneficial from it in building a stable development.