Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both viewpoints and then give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The negative
effects
of human activity have been a main topic of debate.
While
some individuals believe that these types of
activities
are not avoidable, others argue that significant actions should be taken to decrease these consequences. Both sides of the argument present important notes which will be discussed on
then
give my opinion. First of all, human
activities
have significantly contributed to harmful impacts on the
habitat
and environment leading to negative
effects
on flora and fauna.
Therefore
, it is of paramount importance to address these kinds of challenges,
such
as air pollution and cultivation. So, by placing more emphasis on these harmful
effects
, it is noticeable that many specific species of animals are dramatically in danger of distinction. A prime illustration of
this
is the Iranian cheetah, which is in danger of becoming extinct in the near future.
As a result
, if both
people
and governments do not take useful actions to reduce these consequences, many plants and animals will be destroyed.
In contrast
, some
people
would argue that human
activities
can not be restricted or banned to prevent the
habitat
.
In other words
, they believe that these negative
effects
on the environment and
habitat
would be avoidable,
For instance
, consider enforcement an implement to destroy a rural area in order to build residential areas for citizens.
As a result
, building residential complexes or skyscrapers is essential for large cities to be home to many
people
. In conclusion,
while
there are varying opinions on the
effects
of human
activities
on planets and animals some
people
believe that taking action is essential,
while
others have a contrasting view. I firmly advocate the opinion that taking significant and practical actions to prevent
habitat
should be necessary.
Submitted by mahanz on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

clear comprehensive ideas
Your essay would benefit from further elaboration on a few ideas to enhance clarity. For instance, when discussing human activities, provide specific examples beyond those given, to paint a clearer picture of the impacts.
complete response
While your essay covers both viewpoints, including a few more solutions or actions that can be taken to mitigate these effects could further strengthen your argument and completeness of response.
introduction conclusion present
Your introduction clearly sets up the discussion of both viewpoints, which is essential for good coherence.
relevant specific examples
You have effectively illustrated your points with a specific example, like the situation of the Iranian cheetah, which enhances your task achievement.
logical structure
There is a logical flow of ideas from introduction through to conclusion, which aids in maintaining coherence throughout.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • habitat destruction
  • species extinction
  • urbanization
  • deforestation
  • ecosystem
  • environmental preservation
  • economic imperatives
  • population growth
  • conservation efforts
  • sustainable practices
  • reforestation
  • wildlife protection laws
  • protected areas
  • technological advancements
  • sustainable agriculture
  • renewable energy
  • waste management
  • ecological balance
  • global cooperation
  • environmental education
What to do next:
Look at other essays: