Some people believe that the government should invest more money in public transport, while others think that building more roads is the solution. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Public opinion has long been divided on whether the government should invest more in public
transport
or in building additional roads. In this
essay, I will discuss both perspectives, although
I personally support the view that public transport
deserves greater investment.
The need for efficient transportation is growing proportionally with rapid population growth, which has sparked debate over prioritizing public transport
or expanding road
infrastructure. Public transport
offers an effective solution to mass mobilization, as it can carry a large number of passengers in a single trip. It also
helps alleviate traffic congestion and reduce air pollution from internal combustion vehicles. However
, while
the benefits are substantial, the initial investment required can be quite high when considering vehicle procurement, supporting infrastructure, and operational costs.
On the other hand
, expanding road
networks can be a valuable solution, particularly in non-urban areas
. Roads improve accessibility and connectivity for people living in suburban or remote areas
that are not served by public transportation. Additionally
, roads and highways that connect cities support the supply chain industry by providing essential trade routes for goods and services. However
, this
approach tends to be car-centric and may not be the most environmentally friendly choice, nor does it address traffic congestion in urban areas
effectively.
In conclusion, the government should carefully assess both options and strive to implement a balanced approach that caters to the needs of both urban and rural populations. Investing in public transport
provides long-term sustainability by reducing congestion and pollution, making it essential for high-density areas
. Meanwhile, enhancing road
networks in less urbanized regions can improve accessibility and stimulate local economies. A dual approach that prioritizes public transportation in cities and road
infrastructure in underserved regions offers a comprehensive solution to support mobility, economic growth, and environmental responsibility.Submitted by knshlaks on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Include more specific examples to support arguments. For instance, mention specific cities or countries where public transport investment has succeeded.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next by using linking phrases or sentences.
task achievement
The essay presents a balanced discussion of both sides of the argument, which contributes to a complete task response.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-structured, clearly outlining the main ideas and summarizing the argument effectively.
coherence cohesion
Main points are well-supported with logical reasoning, especially in the discussion of public transport benefits and road expansion drawbacks.