Some people think that “vertical” city is the best, where people live and work in tall buildings. Others think that“horizontal”city is better, where there is few tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In modern society, there are two different perspectives regarding whether more tall

buildings

should be constructed in urban areas.

While

there are some advantages to living in a “horizontal”

city

, I believe that a “vertical”

city

, characterized by tall

buildings

, is generally more beneficial for the urbanization process. On one hand, those in favour of “horizontal” cities argue that there should be more room for urban parks. These green places provide spaces for citizens to relax, exercise, and socialize,

while

also

creating habitats for various species, which increases biodiversity within the

city

. Trees and plants in urban parks can absorb harmful substances from the atmosphere, leading to a healthier environment for residents.

Additionally

, having fewer tall

buildings

can mean reduced congestion, as it spreads the population more evenly across the

city

and can help prevent everyone from heading to the same destination at peak times.

On the other hand

, people who advocate for more tall

buildings

in the

city

emphasize the efficient use of limited land resources. The acceleration of urbanization attracts larger populations to the

city

in search of better life and work opportunities. High-rise

buildings

,

such

as modern apartment complexes, provide affordable housing for more residents within a smaller footprint, helping to accommodate population growth without urban sprawl. In my opinion, there are

further

positive effects of “vertical” cities to consider, especially in promoting the concentration of industry and commerce.

For instance

, clusters of companies within commercial

buildings

offer a wide range of job opportunities, allowing people to pursue their career development in close proximity to home. Meanwhile, these corporations drive economic growth by providing services and products, contributing significantly to the

city

’s economy.

Finally

, with various facilities in a tall building, citizens can get anything they want - like gyms, cafes, and retail stores - within walking distance, which substantially enhances convenience and reduces the need for long commutes. In conclusion, I would argue that with more reasonable planning of urban areas, the advantages of living in a “vertical”

city

do outweigh the disadvantages.