The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the table provided compares the percentages of positive feedback on diverse aspects of a university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. In general,
although
marginal aspects like offered modules had to be improved, substantial educational issues were desirable at that university. It is evident from the information supplied that print resources were the most satisfying aspect of the university for the students. From the highest positive rating of 84% in 2000, it peaked at 89% in 2005. Yet, by far the most significant change to take place during
this
period was the increased satisfaction with electronic resources. Having a mere 45% good ratings in 2000, it soared to 88% in 2010, competing with print resources at the same rate. Teaching,
also
, seems to be of good quality since positive ratings to it fluctuated between 63% and 69% from 2000 to 2010. In stark contrast,
however
, the range of modules offered was less appealing to students. It not only gained just 32% good feedback in 2000, it dropped to 27% in 2010.
Submitted by golriiz.azizi1991 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • survey
  • results
  • university
  • 2000
  • 2005
  • 2010
  • main features
  • comparisons
  • relevant
  • trends
  • responses
  • time
  • significance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: