Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think is a good idea. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years, globalization has brought about rapid changes in the world, leading
people
to adopt broader perspectives.
This
has resulted in individuals, regardless of
age
, gaining opportunities to work for the government, with some even being appointed to significant positions.
This
situation has sparked debate about whether it is appropriate for younger
people
to hold
such
roles. From my perspective, individuals should be employed based on their qualifications rather than their
age
. On the one hand, critics argue that appointing young
people
to important government positions is risky because experience and maturity are essential for leadership. These qualities are developed over years of working and cannot be replaced by theoretical knowledge alone.
For instance
, Thailand’s most recent prime minister, appointed at the
age
of 38, faced criticism for immature
behavior
Change the spelling
behaviour
show examples
,
such
as bringing her children to the workplace and giving simplistic answers to reporters.
Such
actions demonstrate the potential challenges of appointing younger
leaders
who may lack the depth of experience needed to navigate complex situations.
On the other hand
, supporters of allowing younger
people
in significant roles argue that hiring should be based on merit, not
age
. Youthful
leaders
often bring fresh perspectives, strong determination, and innovative ideas to the table.
Moreover
, they tend to be less exposed to corrupt practices and are more likely to approach their work with honesty and integrity. Younger
leaders
are
also
typically more adaptive and open to learning, making them well-suited to address citizens’ concerns in an ever-changing world.
For example
, they may be more willing to embrace technology and modernize outdated systems compared to older
leaders
. In conclusion,
while
younger
leaders
may lack experience, their adaptability, fresh ideas, and determination make them valuable assets in today’s fast-paced world. By focusing on qualifications and merit rather than
age
, governments can ensure the best candidates are appointed to important positions, fostering growth and innovation.
Submitted by chawanat.pla on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Although the essay thoroughly addresses both perspectives, ensure that you provide even more specific examples to strengthen your argument.
coherence cohesion
While the logical structure is overall clear, consider adding clear transitional phrases to make connections between sentences smoother.
task achievement
The introduction clearly sets the stage for the discussion and expresses a clear opinion, which is crucial for the task response.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reaffirms the opinion, enhancing coherence and cohesion.
task achievement
Main points, such as the adaptability and innovation of young leaders, are well-supported with examples, making the essay compelling.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • far-reaching consequences
  • life and professional experience
  • judicious policymaking
  • fresh perspectives
  • stagnant systems
  • progressive and inclusive policies
  • political acumen
  • ineffective governance
  • demographic
  • long-term planning
  • authoritative presence
  • manipulation
  • seasoned politicians
  • adaptable
  • open-minded
  • flexibility in problem-solving
What to do next:
Look at other essays: