Government investment in the arts,such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public service instead. Do you agree or disagree.

Some people argue that

government

investment in arts,

such

as

music

and theatre is a waste of

money

, and the

government

should invest that

money

in public welfare. I personally disagree with

this

statement because investment in

art

will help to increase the

income

of the

government

, and will inspire others to practice

art

. Investment in

art

will help to increase the

income

of the

government

. If the

government

invests in

art

and

music

,

artists

and

musicians

will practice

art

and

music

and arrange concerts and exhibitions. The

government

can collect

money

from the taxes and VAT of these events. It will help to reduce the other financial burdens of the

government

because the

government

can utilize that

money

for those purposes.

For example

, in Australia,

musicians

pay the

government

an extra tax if they arrange concerts and earn from them.

Moreover

, if the

government

invests in

art

and

music

, people will be inspired to practice

art

and

music

. The number of

artists

and

musicians

will be increased, which will be beneficial for the

government

to increase its

income

.

Artists

can earn more than the general public, which will make them rich and

solvant

Correct your spelling

solvent

.

For instance

, in Canada, the

government

pay

artists

with

Change preposition

apply

show examples

extra salaries, which not only helps them to meet their basic needs,

Correct word choice

and

show examples

lead a luxurious life. In conclusion, I personally agree with the viewpoint that the

government

should invest in

artists

and

musicians

because they can earn

money

and

also

provide the

government

with

an

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

extra

income

.