In some countries, there are not enough medical or educational facilities in rural ares. Therefore, some people believe newly graduated teachers and doctors should be sent to work in rural area for sometime. Other people think that people should be free to choose where they work after graduation. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Recently, there have not sufficient healthcare amenities and educational institutions in the countryside. Many
individuals
think that students should be transferred to
work
in rural
areas
after graduation in corresponding fields,
although
others claim that they should be free to choose their own career path. From my point of view, sending to
work
in rural
areas
should not be mandatory, graduates should pursue their own goals. On the one hand, proponents of the view in
favor
Change the spelling
favour
show examples
of sending newly graduated students to rural
areas
claim that it might address certain problems in isolated
areas
. One of the primary reasons is that
this
action should provide invaluable experience to the
individuals
which enhances their professional skills.
However
, they face some new challenges in these diverse environments, and they become more adaptable and knowledgeable professionals.
Additionally
, more and more
individuals
seek jobs after graduation;
as a result
, it
also
solves some points of unemployment.
For example
, in Azerbaijan, the government sends graduates to remote
areas
not only to foster these services there but
also
to ensure their job prospects.
On the other hand
, opponents argue that enforcing mandatorily
work
in the countryside might restrict people's freedom to choose their own career paths.
In other words
, they would become dissatisfied with their
work
, resulting in poor performance.
According to
the researchers, if
individuals
have
Add a missing verb
do have
show examples
not a tendency to do their job,
this
leads to insufficient consequences.
Further
justification is that they are able to face problems in terms of accommodation and commuting. In my opinion,
this
pattern has a profound impact on their performance.
For instance
, any trouble either finding a house or longer travel time might be stressful. In conclusion,
while
sending to rural
areas
may foster technical abilities, and provide jobs for them, I am of the opinion that mandatory transferring might be stressful which contributes to bad performance.
Submitted by ilkin.abdullaev04 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

clarity
Ensure clarity in expressing viewpoints and arguments. Some ideas could be communicated more clearly to strengthen the argument.
relevance
Incorporate more specific examples to solidify the points made. Include more concrete instances that illustrate broader points.
structure
The essay includes a well-structured introduction and conclusion, which helps in presenting a clear perspective.
cohesion
Good use of transitional phrases that aid in maintaining the flow of ideas.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Rural areas
  • Essential services
  • Community development
  • Mandatory service
  • Professional skills
  • Career paths
  • Logistical challenges
  • Incentives
  • Scholarships
  • Financial challenges
  • Adaptable professionals
What to do next:
Look at other essays: