Some people think that we should replace old buildings and houses in cities with more modern buildings. Other people think we should protect old buildings. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Some people believe that old
buildings
and
houses
in cities should be replaced with modern
structures
,
while
others argue that old
buildings
should be preserved. I would argue that we should replace outdated
buildings
and
houses
with more modern, multi-functional constructions. On the one hand, preserving old
buildings
is important for several reasons.
Firstly
, old
buildings
can still serve useful purposes.
For example
, some historical
buildings
in Hanoi, despite being constructed decades ago, are still used as residences for government officials. Demolishing these
structures
might disrupt their lives and daily routines.
Secondly
, old
buildings
often hold significant historical value.
For instance
, certain
buildings
in Hanoi contain
artifacts
Change the spelling
artefacts
show examples
and memorabilia from past wars, reminding us of the struggles and sacrifices made to achieve independence. These
buildings
serve as cultural and historical landmarks that connect us to our heritage.
On the other hand
, I believe that replacing old
buildings
and
houses
with modern
structures
offers many advantages.
Firstly
, modern
buildings
are designed with advanced features and functionality.
For example
, newly constructed
buildings
in Hanoi are equipped with modern facilities
such
as automatic lighting systems and smart parking solutions, making life more convenient for residents.
Secondly
, modern skyscrapers often provide a range of amenities that enhance living standards.
For instance
, many new apartment complexes include supermarkets, swimming pools, cafes, and other facilities just steps away from residents’ homes, significantly improving their quality of life. In conclusion,
while
old
buildings
and
houses
may hold cultural and historical significance, I believe that replacing them with modern
structures
is a better choice
due to
the benefits of improved design, functionality, and quality of life.
Submitted by nguyennguyet.vcu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure examples represent diverse geographical contexts to broaden the appeal.
coherence and cohesion
Consider linking paragraphs more fluidly; more transition words could improve cohesion.
task response
The essay provides a well-balanced discussion on both views.
task response
Arguments are well-supported with relevant examples, like those from Hanoi.
coherence and cohesion
Clear structure with an introduction, two detailed body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • paramount
  • evolutionary journey
  • tangible link
  • fostering
  • sense of belonging
  • architectural beauty
  • economic benefit
  • tourist attractions
  • preservation techniques
  • structural integrity
  • energy-efficient
  • sustainable architecture
  • cultural preservation
  • urban demands
  • contemporary lifestyles
What to do next:
Look at other essays: